Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39583902›Full record

ArticleTemperature (Austin, Tex.)2024

Heat strain differences walking in hot-dry and warm-wet environments of equivalent wet bulb globe temperature.

Nathan E Bartman, Nicole T Vargas, Lora A Cavuoto, David Hostler, Riana R Pryor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Temperature (Austin, Tex.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nathan E BartmanCenter for Research and Education in Special Environments, Department of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA.
Nicole T VargasSchool of Medicine and Psychology, College of Health and Medicine, The Australian National University, Acton, AU, Australia.
Lora A CavuotoDepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA.
David HostlerCenter for Research and Education in Special Environments, Department of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA.
Riana R PryorCenter for Research and Education in Special Environments, Department of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7038-0884

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wet bulb globe temperature (WBGT) is a commonly used measure to predict heat strain in workers. Different combinations of environmental conditions can create equivalent WBGT, yet it remains unknown whether biophysical, physiological, and perceptual responses vary when working in different but equivalent hot conditions. The purpose of the study was to compare body heat storage and physiological and perceptual strain during walking in hot-dry and warm-wet conditions of the same WBGT. Twelve subjects (age: 22 ± 2 y) walked for 90 min at 60% maximum heart rate in a 27.8°C WBGT environment of hot-dry (HD: 40°C, 19% relative humidity) or warm-wet (WW: 30°C, 77% relative humidity) conditions. Partitional calorimetry was used to estimate heat storage. Core temperature at 90 min (HD: 38.5 ± 0.5°C; WW: 38.4 ± 0.3°C,

Indexed as

Environmentheat strainhyperthermiathermoregulationwork

Identifiers

PMID39583902
PMCPMC11583583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.