ArticleInfection prevention in practice2024
Methicillin and vancomycin-resistant
Article in Infection prevention in practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Phenotypic and genotypic antimicrobial resistance profiles of gram-positive cocci and non-fermenting gram-negative rods.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Biogenic Silver-Selenium nanocomposite with anticancer activity and potent efficacy against vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.PloS one · 2026Article
- Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization and associated factors in clinical isolates among patients attending a tertiary medical centre in Nigeria.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Prevalence, characterization and antibiogram of Staphylococcus aureus isolates from bovine and swine population in Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, India.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- MRSA: the enduring foe.Infection prevention in practice · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Methicillin and vancomycin-resistant Methods: A hospital-based cross-sectional prospective study was conducted on 384 patients with wound infections including surgical wound who sought healthcare at Nekemte Specialized Hospital. Wound samples were collected using aseptic techniques and cultured on blood agar and mannitol salt agar. Vancomycin E-test and cefoxitin (30 μg) antibiotic disc diffusion were used to detect MRSA and VRSA, respectively. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 23, and a Results: Of the 384 wound samples collected, 109 (28.4%) were identified as Conclusions: This study found significant levels of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.