ArticleInternational journal of forest engineering2024
Multi-objective optimization of cable-road layouts in smart forestry.
Article in International journal of forest engineering, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Multi-objective optimization of cable-road layouts in smart forestry.International journal of forest engineering · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Current cable-road layouts for timber harvesting in steep terrain are often based on either manual planning or automated layouts generated from low-resolution GIS data, limiting potential benefits and informed decision-making. In this paper, we present a novel approach to improve cable-road design using multi-objective optimization based on realistic cable-road representations. We systematically compare the effectiveness of single-objective and multi-objective optimization methods for generating layouts using these representations. We implement and evaluate the performance of a weighted single-objective approach, the AUGMECON2 and NSGA-II multi-objective methods in comparison to a layout manually created by a forestry expert, taking into account installation costs, harvesting volumes, residual stand damage and lateral yarding workload. In addition to implementing the first linear programming multi-objective optimization for realistic cable-road representations by adapting AUGMECON2, we also present the first implementation of a multi-objective genetic algorithm (NSGA-II) with simulated annealing for this purpose and evaluate their respective strengths. We find that the use of multi-objective optimization provides advantages in terms of cost-effective, balanced and adaptable cable-road layouts while allowing economic and environmental considerations to be incorporated into the design phase.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.