ArticleHeliyon2024
Biological and clinical characteristics of non-small cell lung cancer non-specific subtype.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Nanostructured lipid carriers as co-delivery systems for cancer therapy: Prospects and challenges.International journal of pharmaceutics: X · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Non-small cell lung cancer-not otherwise specified (NSCLC-NOS) is a rare subtype of NSCLC that cannot be classified specifically based on morphology and/or special staining. This study aimed to explore the clinical features, biological and pathological characteristics, treatment, and prognosis of NSCLC-NOS. Methods: This retrospective study included NSCLC-NOS patients diagnosed and treated between 2010 and 2022. Clinical features, gene expression, first-line treatment, and prognosis were analyzed. Kaplan-Meier methods were calculated and log-rank tests and univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed to determine the relationship between prognostic factors and survival. Results: Of 105 NSCLC-NOS patients, most were male (92.4 %), smokers (78.1 %), with a median age of 64 years, and advanced stage (IIIc-IV, 72.4 %). Immunohistochemical analysis showed minimal expression of p40, NapsinA, and TTF-1, whereas cytokeratin (CK) was expressed in 100 % of cases. 20.5 % of 39 patients who underwent genetic testing had driver gene mutations, including EGFR, KRAS, and ROS1. Among 69 patients with complete treatment information, 58 received platinum-based chemotherapy, with paclitaxel being the most commonly used combination chemotherapy drug (n = 25), followed by pemetrexed (n = 21). The objective response rate (ORR) of paclitaxel was found to be higher compared to pemetrexed (83.3 % vs. 54.5 %, P = 0.296). Furthermore, the combination of paclitaxel with immunotherapy demonstrated superior benefits in comparison to pemetrexed (76.9 % vs. 50.0 %, P = 0.367). The median progression-free survival (PFS) for patients treated with monotherapy paclitaxel, the paclitaxel-immunotherapy combination, and the pemetrexed-immunotherapy combination were 6.6 months (95 % CI: 1.508-11.692; P = 0.017), 15.7 months (95 % CI: 14.071-17.329; P = 0.017), and 11.8 months (95 % CI: 10.279-13.321; P = 0.324), respectively. The median overall survival (OS) was 13.6 months. Anatomic location (P = 0.026) and immunotherapy use (P = 0.003) were associated with OS. Multivariate analysis confirmed that anatomical location and immunotherapy use were factors influencing the prognosis. Conclusion: NSCLC-NOS is common in male smokers and often diagnosed at an advanced stage with low mutation rate. Paclitaxel with immunotherapy may have better benefits as a first-line treatment. Anatomic location and immunotherapy use are prognostic factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.