ArticleHeliyon2024
Load recognition of connecting-shaft rotor system under complex working conditions.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A method for qualitatively recognizing the load of the rolling equipment's connecting-shaft rotor system is proposed in this paper due to the complexity of rolling production conditions and the limitations of single source response signals. The method is oriented towards fusing the vibration and motor's current information. First, singular value decomposition and wavelet packet analysis are used to preprocess the two types of response signals. Then, the Bayesian estimation method in feature-level fusion achieves qualitative recognition and analysis of rotor system load types. Corresponding load experiments are completed on a load recognition test platform based on vibration and the motor's current signals. The research results show that the load recognition method based on fusion information can recognize the type of load excitation with a recognition accuracy of 91.7 %, higher than other single-source response signal methods. Therefore, the feasibility of the aforementioned theoretical methods is verified.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.