ArticleHeliyon2024
Validation of 2D lateral cephalometric analysis using artificial intelligence-processed low-dose cone beam computed tomography.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Traditional cephalometric radiographs depict a three-dimensional structure in a two-dimensional plane; therefore, errors may occur during a quantitative assessment. Cone beam computed tomography, on the other hand, minimizes image distortion, allowing essential areas to be observed without overlap. Artificial intelligence can be used to enhance low-dose cone beam computed tomography images. This study aimed to clinically validate the use of artificial intelligence-processed low-dose cone beam computed tomography for generating two-dimensional lateral cephalometric radiographs by comparing these artificial intelligence-enhanced radiographs with traditional two-dimensional lateral cephalograms and those derived from standard cone beam computed tomography. Methods: Sixteen participants who had previously undergone both cone beam computed tomography and plain radiography were selected. Group I included standard lateral cephalometric radiographs. Group II included cone beam computed tomography-produced lateral cephalometric radiographs, and Group III included artificial intelligence-processed low-dose cone beam computed tomography-produced lateral cephalometric radiographs. Lateral cephalometric radiographs of the three groups were analyzed using an artificial intelligence-based cephalometric analysis platform. Results: A total of six angles and five lengths were measured for dentofacial diagnosis. There were no significant differences in measurements except for nasion-menton among the three groups. Conclusions: Low-dose cone beam computed tomography could be an efficient method for cephalometric analyses in dentofacial treatment. Artificial intelligence-processed low-dose cone beam computed tomography imaging procedures have the potential in a wide range of dental applications. Further research is required to develop artificial intelligence technologies capable of producing acceptable and effective outcomes in various clinical situations. Clinical significance: Replacing standard cephalograms with cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) to evaluate the craniofacial relationship has the potential to significantly enhance the diagnosis and treatment of selected patients. The effectiveness of low-dose (LD)-CBCT was assessed in this study. The results indicated that lateral cephalograms reconstructed using LD-CBCT were comparable to standard lateral cephalograms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.