ArticleHeliyon2024
How to combine soil and plant indicators to manage nitrogen fertilisation in vineyards?
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Reduced Nitrogen Fertilizer Combined with Organic Fertilizer Affects Growth and Soil Physicochemical Properties ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Context: Although grapevine nitrogen (N) needs are moderate, N fertilisation in vineyards requires carefully management because berry development, aromatic composition and hence winemaking are largely influenced by N nutrition. Our objective was to develop a method for reasoned N fertilisation between and during the seasons. Methods: Specific sensitivities of soil and plant indicators to N supply and availability were estimated and indicator robustness was quantified using contrasted environmental conditions, crop management and N fertilisation in an experimental network comprising five vineyards in southern France over four successive years. The effects of four N fertilisation treatments combining contrasted amounts, forms and timing on the indicators were tested using linear models. Multiple factorial multiple analysis was used to study the effect of environmental and management factors on indicator sensitivity to mineral N fertilisation at budburst. Results: Yield, soil mineral nitrogen at budburst, chlorophyll concentration (SPAD) at veraison, leaf nitrogen content and yeast assimilable nitrogen (YAN) at harvest, were all sensitive to N fertilisation after four years. Different effects of the N treatments were observed from year three for SPAD and from year one for YAN. Additionally, SPAD and YAN indicators distinguished contrasted strategies based on different timings of N supply or the form of N fertiliser. Lastly, the response of the SPAD and YAN indicators was only slightly influenced by pedoclimatic conditions or cultural practices, at least for the variables tested here. Conclusion: Two N indicators measured from veraison (SPAD) to harvest (YAN), can provide valuable information for tactical and long-term fertilisation decisions. Notably, early SPAD information may improve technical vineyard management of interactions between fertilisation and other practices (e.g. weed control or tillage) that interfere with plant N nutrition and enable later correction of YAN values. Combining these indicators with non-destructive imaging techniques should improve N and mineral monitoring in general.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.