ArticleHeliyon2024
Effect of different surface treatments on retention and fracture strength of zirconia crowns over Ti-base zirconia abutments.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Influence of Machining, Polishing, and Glazing on Surface Properties and Biological Performance of Zirconia and Lithium Disilicate Dental Ceramics.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Limited evidence suggested different outcomes of surface treatment methods on zirconia abutments and crowns. Therefore, we investigated the effect of grooving, hot etching, and airborne particle abrasion (APA) methods on zirconia crowns over Ti-base zirconia abutments retention and fracture strength. Materials and methods: In this Results: Hot etching and grooving on the crown or abutment significantly resulted in higher retention (P < 0.001). The fracture strength significantly differed among the five groups (P = 0.041), with the highest fracture strength observed in the GrCr-APAAb group and the lowest for the APACr-GrAb group; however, no significant differences were found in pairwise comparisons between groups (P > 0.05). By considering both fracture strength and retention, grooving, hot etching, and APA were confirmed for better crown and abutment function, respectively. Conclusion: Grooving surface treatment was the best method due to its high fracture strength and retention, followed by hot etching due to its high retention compared to APA, which can be considered a suitable method for cementing zirconia crown on zirconia abutments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.