Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39583784›Full record

ReviewPlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2024

Clinically Applied Biomechanics of Mesh-reinforced Ventral Hernia Repair: A Practical Review.

Sanjay K A Jinka, Jeffrey E Janis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sanjay K A JinkaFrom the Department of Plastic Surgery, Wright State University, Dayton, Ohio.
Jeffrey E JanisDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Ventral hernia repair is inherently prone to recurrence. This article is a practical review that summarizes the literature on the biomechanics of ventral hernia repairs to provide clinically applicable, evidence-based recommendations to reduce hernia recurrence. Methods: A practical review of all relevant literature in PubMed concerning the mechanics of ventral hernia repairs and the forces involved was conducted in August 2023. Results: Of the 598 full-text publications retrieved, 29 satisfied inclusion criteria. Among these, 5 articles included enough numeric data for a quantitative analysis of the ultimate tensile strength of the layers of the abdominal wall. Conclusions: The utilization of mesh in ventral hernia repairs is recommended to strengthen weakened abdominal wall tissue. It is essential to primarily close the anterior sheath with a robust mesh-tissue overlap to promote "load-sharing" between the mesh and the abdominal wall. This approach reduces mesh deformity and stress on fixation points, leading to lower hernia recurrence rates. Minimizing mesh fixation (when placed in the retromuscular plane) can reduce postoperative pain and hospital stay without significantly affecting hernia recurrence. Orienting mesh according to abdominal anisotropy is crucial for reducing mesh stiffness, improving healing, and preventing recurrence. Future studies with advanced computer modeling will continue to provide further insights into mesh biomechanics and abdominal wall healing.

Identifiers

PMID39583784
PMCPMC11584225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.