Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39583733›Full record

ArticleACS omega2024

Cross-Run Hybrid Features Improve the Identification of Data-Independent Acquisition Proteomics.

Yachen Liu, Longfei Mei, Chenyu Liang, Chuan-Qi Zhong, Mengsha Tong, Rongshan Yu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yachen LiuSchool of Informatics, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian 361000, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6782-2197
Longfei MeiSchool of Informatics, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian 361000, China.
Chenyu LiangNational Institute for Data Science in Health and Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian 361102, China.
Chuan-Qi ZhongSchool of Life Sciences, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian 361102, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8354-7727
Mengsha TongNational Institute for Data Science in Health and Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian 361102, China.
Rongshan YuSchool of Informatics, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian 361000, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The analysis of data-independent acquisition (DIA) mass spectrometry data is crucial for comprehensive proteomics studies. However, traditional single-run methods often fall short in terms of identification depth and consistency. We present HFDiscrim, a specialized multirun DIA analysis tool aimed at enhancing the depth and consistency of reliable peptide identifications of DIA analysis tools. HFDiscrim was extensively benchmarked on multiple data sets, including the MCB data set, the ccRCC data set, and a three-species benchmark mixture. Compared to PyProphet, HFDiscrim identified 22.04% more precursors, 19.1% more peptides, and 13.2% more proteins while maintaining a controllable false discovery rate. Furthermore, HFDiscrim demonstrated higher identification rates and improved reproducibility across multiple runs. HFDiscrim is publicly available at https://github.com/yachliu/HFDiscrim.

Identifiers

PMID39583733
PMCPMC11579728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.