Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39583651›Full record

ArticleAlzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)

Aβ status assessment in a hypothetical scenario prior to treatment with disease-modifying therapies: Evidence from 10-year real-world experience at university memory clinics.

Matthias Brendel, Tandis Parvizi, Johannes Gnörich, Christof Elias Topfstedt, Katharina Buerger, Daniel Janowitz, Boris-Stephan Rauchmann, Robert Perneczky, Carolin Kurz, Dirk Mehrens and 16 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Dynamic [Molecular neurodegeneration · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Longitudinal monitoring of tau aggregation in progressive supranuclear palsy with [Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Article
  4. Italian intersocietal recommendations for restructuring the diagnostic-therapeutic pathway for the implementation and appropriate use of anti-amyloid monoclonal antibodies in Alzheimer's disease.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Review
  5. Lecanemab approval in EU: what should we be ready for?- the EANM perspective.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

Matthias BrendelDepartment of Nuclear Medicine LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich Munich Germany.
Tandis ParviziDepartment of Nuclear Medicine LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich Munich Germany.
Johannes GnörichDepartment of Nuclear Medicine LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich Munich Germany.
Christof Elias TopfstedtInstitute for Stroke and Dementia Research (ISD) LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich Munich Germany.
Katharina BuergerGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) Munich Munich Germany.
Daniel JanowitzInstitute for Stroke and Dementia Research (ISD) LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich Munich Germany.
Boris-Stephan RauchmannDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich Munich Germany.
Robert PerneczkyGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) Munich Munich Germany.
Carolin KurzDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich Munich Germany.
Dirk MehrensDepartment of Radiology LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich Munich Germany.
Wolfgang G KunzDepartment of Radiology LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich Munich Germany.
Julia Kusche-PalengaDepartment of Nuclear Medicine LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich Munich Germany.
Agnes Bernadette KlingDepartment of Nuclear Medicine LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich Munich Germany.
Antonia BuchalDepartment of Radiology LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich Munich Germany.
Elizabet NestorovaDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich Munich Germany.
Sara SilvaiehDepartment of Neurology Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria.
Raphael WurmDepartment of Neurology Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria.
Tatjana Traub-WeidingerDivision of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria.
Sigrid KlotzComprehensive Center for Clinical Neurosciences and Mental Health Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria.
Günther RegelsbergerComprehensive Center for Clinical Neurosciences and Mental Health Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria.
Axel RomingerDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Inselspital Bern University Hospital, University of Bern Bern Switzerland.
Alexander DrzezgaDepartment of Nuclear Medicine Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne Cologne Germany.
Johannes LevinGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) Munich Munich Germany.
Elisabeth StögmannDepartment of Neurology Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria.
Nicolai FranzmeierMunich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy) Munich Germany.
Günter U HöglingerGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) Munich Munich Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWith the advent of disease-modifying therapies, accurate assessment of biomarkers indicating the presence of disease-associated amyloid beta (Aβ) pathology becomes crucial in patients with clinically suspected Alzheimer's disease (AD). We evaluated Aβ levels in cerebrospinal fluid (Aβ CSF) and Aβ levels in positron emission tomography (Aβ PET) biomarkers in a real-world memory-clinic setting to develop an efficient algorithm for clinical use.

methodsPatients were evaluated for AD-related Aβ pathology from two independent cohorts (Ludwig Maximilian University [LMU],

resultsIn both cohorts, a CSF Aβ42/40 ratio ≥ 7.1% was associated with a low risk of a positive Aβ PET scan (negative predictive value: 94.3%). Implementing two cutoffs revealed 14% to 16% of patients with intermediate results (CSF Aβ42/40 ratio: 5.5%-7.1%), which had a strong benefit from Aβ PET imaging (44%-52% Aβ PET positivity). DISCUSSION: A two-cutoff approach for CSF Aβ42/40 including Aβ PET imaging at intermediate results provides an effective assessment of Aβ pathology in real-world settings. Highlights: We evaluated cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and positron emission tomography (PET) amyloid beta (Aβ) biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease in real-world cohorts.A CSF Aβ 42/40 ratio between 5.5% and 7.1% defines patients at borderline levels.Patients at borderline levels strongly benefit from additional Aβ PET imaging.Two-cutoff CSF Aβ 42/40 and PET will allow effective treatment stratification.

Indexed as

Alzheimer's diseasebiomarkerscerebrospinal fluiddementiapositron emission tomographyreal world

Identifiers

PMID39583651
PMCPMC11582924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.