Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39583573›Full record

ReviewTherapeutic advances in urology

Comprehensive consent in urology using decision aids, leaflets, videos and newer technologies: empowering patient choice and shared decision-making.

Carlotta Nedbal, Nithesh Naik, Niall Davis, Sanjeev Madaan, Theodoros Tokas, Giovanni Cacciamani, Eugenio Ventimiglia, Robert M Geraghty, Dmitry Enikeev, Bhaskar K Somani

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Therapeutic advances in urology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Carlotta NedbalUrology Unit, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, Milan, ITA; Endourology Section, European Association of Urology, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Nithesh NaikDepartment of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0356-7697
Niall DavisDepartment of Urology, Connolly Hospital, Blanchardstown, Dublin, Ireland.
Sanjeev MadaanDepartment of Urology, Darent Valley Hospital, Dartford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4220-5613
Theodoros TokasDepartment of Urology, Medical School, University General Hospital of Heraklion, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece.
Giovanni CacciamaniDepartment of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Eugenio VentimigliaDepartment of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Robert M GeraghtyDepartment of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK.
Dmitry EnikeevDepartment of Urology, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7169-2209
Bhaskar K SomaniDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Trust, Tremona Road, Southampton, Tremona Road, Southampton, Hampshire, SO16 6YD, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6248-6478

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this paper, we explore the usage of decision aids, patient information leaflets (PILs), videos, social media and modern technology to empower patients and enable shared decision-making (SDM). It explores the role of enhanced consent processes in urology. A re-evaluation of the conventional consent process is required towards more patient-centred care and SDM, which prioritises patient education and understanding of their medical conditions and treatment pathways. The use of decision aids, such as multimedia resources and PILs, is crucial in enhancing patients' understanding, level of satisfaction, quality of life and healthcare utilisation. New tools are opening exciting possibilities for patient education and information distribution, such as Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer (ChatGPT). The effectiveness of ChatGPT in comparison to well-established PILs is still up for debate, despite the fact that it makes information easily accessible. Improving patients' involvement, understanding and engagement in SDM procedures relies heavily on decision aids, PILs and current technological integration. Patients and healthcare practitioners should work together in accordance with the principles of SDM, which include considering patients' values, backgrounds, priorities and preferences when making treatment decisions. The emphasis on patient-centred care has prompted a re-evaluation of traditional consent processes in urology, with more emphasis on the shared decision-making process. Several informative aids are currently available as reported in the literature, ranging from 3D models, multimedia presentations and virtual reality (VR) devices. While the costs of these tools might be substantial, the advantages of adopting such informative resources are unmistakable. Social media and platforms such as patient-physician blogs are increasingly popular sources of medical information. Urologists should embrace these platforms to enhance patient engagement and the quality of information provided. Despite recent progress, there remains significant room for improvement in patient education and engagement which is achievable via concerted efforts of a wider medical community.

Indexed as

comprehensive consentdecision aidspatient educationshared decision-makingsocial mediaurology

Identifiers

PMID39583573
PMCPMC11585043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.