ReviewCureus2024
Impact of Digital Workflow Integration on Fixed Prosthodontics: A Review of Advances and Clinical Outcomes.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reimagining Dental Education: Integrating Digital Technologies for a Global, Digitally Native Generation-A Perspective.European journal of dentistry · 2026Article
- Current Clinical Practices and Digital Technology Adoption in Provisional Prosthodontics: A Cross-Sectional Survey Among Romanian Dental Practitioners.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
- Digital workflow integration and standardized communication protocols in prosthetic dentistry: a multicenter cross-sectional study on innovation impact and interdisciplinary collaboration.Medicine and pharmacy reports · 2026Article
- Effect of Different Impression and Fabrication Techniques on the Precision of Custom Metal Posts: Fully Digital, Semi-Digital, and Conventional.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2026Article
- Key Factors Influencing the Adoption of CAD/CAM in the Fabrication of Indirect Dental Restorations.International journal of dentistry · 2026Article
- A Preliminary Randomized Trial on the Efficiency and Clinical Value of a Cementless Screw-Retained Implant Workflow in Single-Implant Restorations.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Article
- Influence of the Processing Method on the Nano-Mechanical Properties and Porosity of Dental Acrylic Resins Fabricated by Heat-Curing, 3D Printing and Milling Techniques.Dentistry journal · 2025Article
- Accuracy of Digital Impressions for Veneer Restorations: A Narrative Review and Case Illustration.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Advances and Challenges in the Integration of Digital Technologies in Complete Dentures: A Narrative Literature Review.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2025Review
- Trueness and Internal Fit of 3D Printed Provisional Veneers: An In Vitro Comparative Study.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The field of prosthodontics has seen substantial advancements with the integration of digital workflows, which have revolutionized traditional clinical practices. These digital technologies, including intraoral scanners (IOS), computer-aided design (CAD), and computer-aided manufacturing (CAM), have enhanced the precision, efficiency, and overall quality of prosthetic restorations. This review explores the clinical outcomes of adopting digital workflows in prosthodontics, with a focus on their impact on accuracy, time efficiency, and patient satisfaction. Additionally, the review addresses the challenges and barriers to widespread adoption, such as high equipment costs and the need for continuous updates and training. A comprehensive literature review was conducted, selecting peer-reviewed studies that focused on the use of digital workflows in tooth-borne and implant-supported prostheses. Findings suggest that digital workflows provide superior accuracy in prosthesis fabrication and significantly reduce treatment time, particularly with the advent of chairside CAD/CAM systems that enable same-day restorations. Furthermore, patient satisfaction is improved due to increased comfort and reduced treatment duration. However, barriers such as the financial investment and learning curve remain obstacles to broader implementation. The review highlights the transformative potential of digital workflows in prosthodontics and emphasizes the need for more long-term clinical studies to further establish their efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.