Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39583534›Full record

ReviewCureus2024

Impact of Digital Workflow Integration on Fixed Prosthodontics: A Review of Advances and Clinical Outcomes.

Layla I Abdulkarim, Faisal Saad S Alharamlah, Razan M Abubshait, Deemah A Alotaibi, Anas O Abouonq

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Layla I AbdulkarimDentistry, College of Dentistry, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, SAU.
Faisal Saad S AlharamlahDentistry, College of Dentistry, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, SAU.
Razan M AbubshaitDentistry, College of Dental Medicine, University of Sharjah, Khobar, SAU.
Deemah A AlotaibiDentistry, College of Dentistry, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, SAU.
Anas O AbouonqProsthodontics, Aljouf University, Khobar, SAU.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The field of prosthodontics has seen substantial advancements with the integration of digital workflows, which have revolutionized traditional clinical practices. These digital technologies, including intraoral scanners (IOS), computer-aided design (CAD), and computer-aided manufacturing (CAM), have enhanced the precision, efficiency, and overall quality of prosthetic restorations. This review explores the clinical outcomes of adopting digital workflows in prosthodontics, with a focus on their impact on accuracy, time efficiency, and patient satisfaction. Additionally, the review addresses the challenges and barriers to widespread adoption, such as high equipment costs and the need for continuous updates and training. A comprehensive literature review was conducted, selecting peer-reviewed studies that focused on the use of digital workflows in tooth-borne and implant-supported prostheses. Findings suggest that digital workflows provide superior accuracy in prosthesis fabrication and significantly reduce treatment time, particularly with the advent of chairside CAD/CAM systems that enable same-day restorations. Furthermore, patient satisfaction is improved due to increased comfort and reduced treatment duration. However, barriers such as the financial investment and learning curve remain obstacles to broader implementation. The review highlights the transformative potential of digital workflows in prosthodontics and emphasizes the need for more long-term clinical studies to further establish their efficacy.

Indexed as

3d printingaccuracycad/camclinical outcomesdigital workflowsintraoral scannerspatient satisfactionprosthetic restorationsprosthodonticstime efficiency

Identifiers

PMID39583534
PMCPMC11585284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.