Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39583518›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Prospective Analysis Comparing the Asthma Control Test (ACT) to the New Subjective Asthma Questionnaire (SAQ-1) for Assessing Asthma Control.

Bryan K Dunn, Kori L Brewer, Keven O'Brien, Veeranna Maddipati, Messanh K Ameduite, Anagha Malur

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bryan K DunnPulmonary and Critical Care, East Carolina University Brody School of Medicine, Greenville, USA.
Kori L BrewerEmergency Medicine, East Carolina University Brody School of Medicine, Greenville, USA.
Keven O'BrienBiostatistics, East Carolina University, Greenville , USA.
Veeranna MaddipatiPulmonary and Critical Care, East Carolina University Brody School of Medicine, Greenville, USA.
Messanh K AmeduitePulmonary and Critical Care, East Carolina University Health Medical Center/East Carolina University Brody School of Medicine, Greenville, USA.
Anagha MalurPulmonary and Critical Care, East Carolina University Brody School of Medicine, Greenville, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Asthma affects millions of patients worldwide. The Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) emphasizes the need for individualized treatment based on symptoms and risk of exacerbations. The Asthma Control Test (ACT) is a well-validated tool and considered standard-of-care for assessing asthma control. Our research question was to determine the correlation of the new Subjective Asthma Questionnaire-1 (SAQ-1) with the established ACT for assessing asthma control, and what are the associations of demographic and clinical variables with both scoring systems. Study Design and Methods In this prospective observational study, ACT, SAQ-1 scores, demographic and clinical characteristics were obtained during the pulmonary outpatient clinic visits of 115 adult patients with mild, moderate, and severe persistent asthma. Results Our research observed correlations between the ACT and SAQ-1 scores. Asthma severity was negatively associated with both ACT and SAQ-1 scores, while race had a weaker negative association with both scores. The SAQ-1 was found to have excellent sensitivity and specificity for assessing not well-controlled asthma. Conclusion The SAQ-1 is a valid and simple alternative to the ACT for assessing asthma control and may improve patient compliance and enable more frequent assessments.

Indexed as

asthmaasthma control test (act)global initiative for asthma (gina) guidelinesnational asthma education and prevention program (naepp) guidelinessubjective asthma questionnaire-1 (saq-1)

Identifiers

PMID39583518
PMCPMC11585912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.