ArticleCureus2024
"This Is a Quiz" Premise Input: A Key to Unlocking Higher Diagnostic Accuracy in Large Language Models.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose Large language models (LLMs) are neural network models that are trained on large amounts of textual data, showing promising performance in various fields. In radiology, studies have demonstrated the strong performance of LLMs in diagnostic imaging quiz cases. However, the inherent differences in prior probabilities of a final diagnosis between clinical and quiz cases pose challenges for LLMs, as LLMs had not been informed about the quiz nature in previous literature, while human physicians can optimize the diagnosis, consciously or unconsciously, depending on the situation. The present study aimed to test the hypothesis that notifying LLMs about the quiz nature might improve diagnostic accuracy. Methods One hundred and fifty consecutive cases from the "Case of the Week" radiological diagnostic quiz case series on the American Journal of Neuroradiology website were analyzed. GPT-4o and Claude 3.5 Sonnet were used to generate the top three differential diagnoses based on the textual clinical history and figure legends. The prompts included or excluded information about the quiz nature for both models. Two radiologists evaluated the accuracy of the diagnoses. McNemar's test assessed differences in correct response rates. Results Informing the quiz nature improved the diagnostic performance of both models. Specifically, Claude 3.5 Sonnet's primary diagnosis and GPT-4o's top 3 differential diagnoses significantly improved when the quiz nature was informed. Conclusion Informing the quiz nature of cases significantly enhances LLMs' diagnostic performances. This insight into LLMs' capabilities could inform future research and applications, highlighting the importance of context in optimizing LLM-based diagnostics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.