ArticleCureus2024
School Teachers' Knowledge and Attitudes Related to Anaphylactic Reactions: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAnaphylaxis is a severe allergic reaction marked by a sudden onset of symptoms affecting multiple bodily systems, and if not addressed promptly, it can lead to fatal outcomes. The primary clinical manifestations often involve skin rash, respiratory distress, and cardiovascular symptoms. Identifying these signs early is crucial for timely intervention, including the administration of epinephrine, aiming to prevent loss of life. This study aims to assess the awareness of symptoms and management of anaphylactic reactions among teachers in Jeddah/Makkah, Saudi Arabia. METHODOLOGY: This cross-sectional study included 742 teachers from both governmental and private schools in Jeddah/Makkah, Saudi Arabia. Only those schools who agreed and facilitated the process of distributing the questionnaire were included in which an electronic structured questionnaire was utilized and distributed among participants. Statistical analysis was done using JMP Pro 15 software (JMP Statistical Discovery LLC, Cary, NC).
resultsMost participants (n = 501, 67.5%) were female, and 374 (50.4%) were between 40 and 50 years old. Most participants believed that skin and eye manifestations were the most common clinical presentation. When inquired about anaphylaxis treatment, the majority of teachers (57%) opted for antihistamines as the preferred emergency treatment. Surprisingly, 407 of the 742 (54.9%) participants have never heard of epinephrine injections.
conclusionThis study concluded that the knowledge of anaphylactic reactions among teachers in Saudi Arabia is limited. Therefore, educational campaigns and programs about anaphylaxis and the management of allergic reactions are recommended to elevate awareness within the teaching community, contributing to a more informed and prepared educational environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.