ReviewCureus2024
Evaluating Post-surgical Stability and Relapse in Orthognathic Surgery: A Comprehensive Review.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Retreatment using temporary anchorage device for a patient with relapse after orthognathic surgery: a case report.International journal of surgery case reports · 2026Article
- Condylar Sag After Orthognathic Surgery: Biomechanical Mechanisms, Surgical Factors, and Clinical Prevention.Cureus · 2026Review
- Concurrent resection and orthognathic surgery for the management of mandibular condyle osteoma: a case report and literature review.Frontiers in oral health · 2026Article
- Clinical and perioperative outcomes of computer-guided versus conventional plan-transfer workflows in orthognathic surgery for skeletal anterior open bite: a randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Comparative Analysis of Postoperative Relapse in Asymmetric and Symmetric Mandibles Following BSSRO for Class III Malocclusion.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2025Article
- Skeletal Stability Following LeFort I Maxillary Advancement With Rigid Fixation: A Retrospective Study.Cureus · 2025Article
- Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Orthognathic surgery is a procedure that allows oral and maxillofacial surgeons to resolve jaw asymmetry issues and restore function, esthetics, and balance. Orthodontics plays a major part in the pre-surgical and post-surgical phases, thus necessitating a multidisciplinary approach. Certain skeletal discrepancies may remain despite correction with routine growth modification and camouflage treatment, or they may not qualify for these treatments. These skeletal discrepancies are addressed through orthognathic surgeries such as the Le Fort I osteotomy for the maxilla and the bilateral split sagittal osteotomy (BSSO) for the mandible. This narrative review aimed to investigate the factors leading to the instability and relapse of the different surgical procedures by comparing the related literature for all three planes: sagittal, vertical, and transverse. Additionally, it highlights the new trends and modern technology in orthognathic surgery. These findings are targeted at elucidating better surgical approaches, understanding what practices ensure long-term stability, and improving outcomes with greater practitioner and patient satisfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.