Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39583456›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

A Comparative Study on the Efficacy of Intravenous Palonosetron Versus a Combination of Ondansetron and Dexamethasone as Prophylaxis for Prevention of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting After Laparoscopic Surgeries.

Deepak Krishnan, Arthi Asokan, Arunkumar Muthalu, Srinivasan Suganya, Chinthavali Sujatha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Deepak KrishnanDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Sri Venkateshwaraa Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Puducherry, IND.
Arthi AsokanDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Sri Venkateshwaraa Medical College and Research Centre, Puducherry, IND.
Arunkumar MuthaluDepartment of Critical Care, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute, Puducherry, IND.
Srinivasan SuganyaDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Sri Venkateshwaraa Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Puducherry, IND.
Chinthavali SujathaDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Sri Venkateshwaraa Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Puducherry, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe most troublesome complaint after general anaesthesia and surgery, especially laparoscopic surgeries, is postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). We routinely use pharmacologic prophylaxis to prevent PONV. In patients undergoing laparoscopic procedures, we assessed the effectiveness of palonosetron compared to ondansetron combined with dexamethasone in preventing the incidence of PONV. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This was a prospective, randomised, double-blind study that included 60 patients aged 18 to 60 years of either sex belonging to ASA physical status I or II undergoing elective laparoscopic surgeries. Before induction of anaesthesia, patients were randomised into two equal groups to receive either 0.075mg of palonosetron (group 1) or 4mg of ondansetron with 4mg of dexamethasone (group 2). Any incidence of nausea or vomiting along with the severity was assessed using the visual analogue scale, and the need for the rescue antiemetic was noted. Statistical analysis was done using an independent sample T-test, chi-square test, and Fisher's exact test. P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

resultsThe overall incidence of PONV was 18% (11 patients), all of which were of mild to moderate severity. The palonosetron group had a lesser incidence of PONV, in three patients (10%) when compared to eight patients (26.6%) in the ondansetron and dexamethasone combination group over a period of 48 hours, but the difference was not statistically significant (P=0.854). The need for the rescue antiemetic was also comparable between both the groups (P=0.129), two patients required the rescue antiemetic (6.66%) in the palonosetron group, while in the ondansetron and dexamethasone group, six patients required the rescue antiemetic (20%).

conclusionBoth palonosetron and ondansetron with dexamethasone prove to be comparably effective in preventing PONV in laparoscopic surgeries and achieving a complete response for a longer period, thus requiring fewer rescue medications with no adverse reaction.

Indexed as

dexamethasonelaparoscopic surgeriesondansetronpalonosetronponv

Identifiers

PMID39583456
PMCPMC11584038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.