Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39583433›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Cardiovascular Disease Prevalence in Non-Hispanic Black Individuals: U.S. Territories vs. Stroke Belt and Non-Stroke Belt States.

Hana Shah, Namra Khan, Carolina Fernandez, Ligia Perez, Georgeta D Vaidean

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hana ShahHerbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, USA.
Namra KhanHerbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, USA.
Carolina FernandezHerbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, USA.
Ligia PerezInstitutional Transformation Assessment, Gardner Institute, Brevard, USA.
Georgeta D VaideanHerbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionExtensive research exists on the increased prevalence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in the "Stroke Belt" states, compared to the remaining United States (U.S.). Social, environmental, and systemic factors and individual behaviors have been investigated, including Black race.  This study aims to assess whether residing in the U.S. territories, Stroke Belt, or non-Stroke Belt states is associated with differences in CVD prevalence among non-Hispanic Black adults.

methodsWe analyzed cross-sectional data from the 2021 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS). All non-Hispanic Black adults (18+) with complete information on key variables, including demographics, CVD outcomes, and relevant risk factors, were included. The prevalence of CVD was defined as self-reported coronary artery disease, stroke, or myocardial infarction. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to calculate crude and adjusted odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).  Results: Of the 31,246 individuals included in our study, 87 (8.7%) residing in the U.S. territories reported experiencing a cardiovascular event, compared to 1487 (10.1%) in the Stroke Belt and 1872 (8.2%) in the non-Stroke Belt regions. Compared to non-Hispanic Black adults residing outside the Stroke Belt, those living in the Stroke Belt had 23% higher odds of reporting CVD (OR 1.23, 95% CI 1.10-1.44) after adjusting for age and gender. In the fully adjusted model, which accounted for additional factors such as comorbidities and socioeconomic status, the odds were slightly attenuated but remained elevated (OR 1.14, 95% CI 0.97-1.35). For Black adults living in the U.S. territories, the odds of reporting CVD were not significantly different from those outside the Stroke Belt in both the age- and gender-adjusted model (OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.66-1.73) and the fully adjusted model (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.49-1.74). Independent of residence, individuals with high blood pressure (OR 2.85, 95% CI 2.05-3.96), diabetes (OR 1.45, 95% CI 1.20-1.75), and high cholesterol (OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.27-1.89) had significantly higher odds of CVD. In contrast, smoking and income were associated with prevalent CVD, while self-reported diet, physical activity, and education level were not.

conclusionContrary to our expectation, we found that non-Hispanic Black adults residing in the U.S. territories had similar self-reported CVD with those living in the non-Stroke Belt regions.  Further research is needed to investigate the socio-behavioral factors influencing cultural and historical disparities among non-Hispanic Black individuals in the U.S. and its territories.

Indexed as

cardiovascular diseasegeographical regionhealth disparitiesnon-hispanic black adultsnon-stroke belt statesracestroke belt statesu.s. territories

Identifiers

PMID39583433
PMCPMC11584243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.