Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39583428›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Brain Removal With an Occipital Hinge Preserving Overlying Anatomy.

Mario Loomis, Jason Nikirk, Teresa Loomis, Dennis Wooten, George Prada Iii

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mario LoomisDepartment of Clinical Anatomy, Sam Houston State University College of Osteopathic Medicine, Conroe, USA.
Jason NikirkDepartment of Clinical Anatomy, Sam Houston State University College of Osteopathic Medicine, Conroe, USA.
Teresa LoomisDepartment of Clinical Anatomy, Sam Houston State University College of Osteopathic Medicine, Conroe, USA.
Dennis WootenDepartment of Clinical Anatomy, Sam Houston State University College of Osteopathic Medicine, Conroe, USA.
George Prada IiiDepartment of Clinical Anatomy, Sam Houston State University College of Osteopathic Medicine, Conroe, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain removal during a gross anatomy course in medical school serves multiple purposes. It allows for the teaching of cranial vault anatomy, as well as the external brain, cranial nerves, and cerebral vasculature. Techniques to remove the brain while preserving these delicate structures generally damage the overlying anatomy of the dura and suboccipital triangle. Even though brain removal usually comes later in most gross anatomy courses, with the suboccipital triangle being taught at the beginning, it is still beneficial to preserve previously dissected structures, not only for use in cumulative practical assessments but also for additional teaching opportunities. Shrinking the availability of time and money has prompted anatomy departments to identify and develop potential areas for shared resources to teach medical students in clerkships, residents, and allied health professionals. The ideal brain removal technique would safely remove the brain, preserving its structure, cranial nerves, and vasculature, while also preserving an intact dura and suboccipital triangle. We present an occipital hinge technique of brain removal that preserves the cranial nerves and vasculature, as well as an intact, in situ dura, without damaging previously dissected suboccipital triangles.

Indexed as

brain removalcranial nervesgross anatomyoccipital hingesuboccipital triangle

Identifiers

PMID39583428
PMCPMC11586063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.