ArticleCureus2024
Initial Clinical and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) Outcomes of Enamel Matrix Derivative-Based Regenerative Therapy in Vertical Bone Defects.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transcriptomic response to compressive force simulating orthodontic tooth movement in cultured porcine epithelial cell rests of Malassez.Odontology · 2026Article
- Potential Applications of Calcium Pyrophosphate for Bone Regeneration: A Systematic Review.Cureus · 2025Review
- Article
- Enamel matrix derivative and root coverage: A literature review.Revista cientifica odontologica (Universidad Cientifica del Sur)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objective Enamel matrix derivatives (EMD) are biomaterials extracted from porcine dental germs. They consist of amelogenins (90%), ameloblastine, enamelin, and amelotin. New evidence has shown that all these proteins can be absorbed onto hydroxyapatite crystals and collagen fibers on the root surface of teeth and initiate regeneration of root cementum as well as stimulate periodontal cell proliferation. Currently, the most preferred method of periodontal regenerative therapy in clinical dental practice involves EMD, thanks to its facilitated surgical protocol and the many postoperative complications associated with guided tissue regeneration. There is scarce data regarding when the first and earliest signs of healing occur after the application of this method. Hence, this study focused on the evaluation and analysis of clinical outcomes and cone-beam CT (CBCT) results at six months after the application of the EMD technique. It aimed to evaluate the efficacy of regenerative therapy with EMD in vertical bone defects six months post-surgical intervention. Material and methods The study was conducted between August 2022 and July 2023 in the Faculty of Dental Medicine, the Medical University - Varna, using the University Medical-Dental Center as a base. The study included 12 cases characterized by bilateral, trilateral, or a combination of the mentioned vertical bone defects. The participants were aged between 31 and 57 years, of both genders, with satisfactory personal oral hygiene. They were in good general condition with no established systemic diseases and gave prior written informed consent. Between the sixth and eighth weeks after the hygiene phase was completed, the patients were re-evaluated, a new periodontal status was recorded, and a CBCT examination was ordered. Three clinical (probing pocket depth, gingival margin level, and clinical attachment level) and three radiographic parameters (A, B, and C) were evaluated in areas of vertical bone defect. Six months after the regenerative therapy using EMD, the same parameters were again recorded in all patients. Finally, after statistical processing of the results, an analysis of the data was performed regarding the early effectiveness of EMD application in regenerative therapy of vertical bone defects. Results The clinical results observed at the six-month mark following regenerative therapy using EMD in vertical bone defects indicated an average reduction in probing depth of 4.50 mm, an average apical migration of the gingival margin by 0.5 mm, and an average clinical attachment level of 4.00 mm. Bone filling was noted on the CBCT, corroborated by the following parameters: A - an average decrease of 1.51 mm; B - an average decrease of 0.50 mm; and C - an average decrease of 0.24 mm. Conclusions The results of our study confirm the remarkable effectiveness of EMD as a regenerative biomaterial. Furthermore, both clinical and CBCT studies demonstrated a very good healing process at an extremely early stage after the surgical intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.