ArticleCureus2024
Predicting Ischemic Stroke in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients: A Machine Learning Approach Using Electronic Medical Records.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Metabolic Adaptation in Acute Ischemic Events: The Critical Role of Acyl-Coenzyme A Synthetase Family in Myocardial Infarction and Ischemic Stroke.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Despite advances in management, patients with ACS remain at a significant risk of developing ischemic stroke (IS), a serious complication associated with high mortality and long-term disability. The accurate prediction of stroke risk in ACS patients can facilitate timely interventions and improve clinical outcomes. Objective This study aimed to develop and validate machine learning (ML) models to predict ischemic stroke within one year of ACS diagnosis, using electronic medical records (EMRs) from a tertiary care hospital in Indonesia. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from 4,789 ACS patients treated at Dr. Sardjito Hospital between 2018 and 2022. Machine learning models, including Logistic Regression, Random Forest, and XGBoost, were trained and validated using patient demographics, comorbidities, and clinical variables. Model performance was assessed using precision, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC)-receiver operating characteristic (ROC). Results Among the study cohort, 212 patients (4.4%) developed ischemic stroke within one year. Logistic Regression demonstrated a balanced performance with a sensitivity of 65%, a specificity of 70%, and an AUC-ROC of 0.70. Random Forest and XGBoost models achieved higher sensitivities (94% and 95%, respectively) but had lower specificities (12% each). The most significant predictors of ischemic stroke included ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), age of ≥60 years, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, and chronic kidney disease. Conclusion The Logistic Regression model, with its balanced sensitivity and specificity, offers a reliable tool for predicting ischemic stroke in ACS patients. The implementation of this model in clinical practice could enhance risk stratification and inform personalized treatment strategies. Future studies should focus on prospective validation and the integration of additional clinical variables.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.