ArticleCureus2024
Bacteriological Profile and Antibiogram Pattern of Wound Infection in a Tertiary Care Hospital.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- ScreeningOpen research Europe · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and aim Wound infection constitutes a major barrier to healing and can have a harmful effect on the patient's quality of life and also on the healing rate of the wound. The widespread use of antibiotics, along with their extensive history of availability, has resulted in significant issues with resistant organisms contributing to morbidity and mortality. The study was conducted to determine the prevalence of bacterial species obtained from the wound sample and its antibiotic resistance pattern. Materials and methods The cross-sectional observational study was conducted from November 2022 to November 2023 in a tertiary care hospital in Karad. 100 clinical samples of wound swabs and pus were studied. The isolates from these clinical samples were further processed as per the standard prescribed for the identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Results Out of 100 isolates, 75 were gram-negative and 25 gram-positive. Among the gram-negative isolates, the predominantly isolated organism was
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.