Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39583373›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Labelling of Fluids in the Sterile Field During Orthopaedic Surgery: A Quality Improvement Initiative.

Benedict Sweetman, Zubair Younis, Sarfraz Khan, Jebran Amin, Ghulam Dastagir Faisal Mohammed, Ellen Ellysia Jones, Charlotte Lemaigre, Satya Pydah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Benedict SweetmanTrauma and Orthopaedics, Ysbyty Gwynedd Hospital, Bangor, GBR.
Zubair YounisOrthopaedics, Royal Shrewsbury Hospital, Shrewsbury, GBR.
Sarfraz KhanTrauma and Orthopaedics, Ysbyty Gwynedd Hospital, Bangor, GBR.
Jebran AminTrauma and Orthopaedics, Ysbyty Gwynedd Hospital, Bangor, GBR.
Ghulam Dastagir Faisal MohammedNeurological Surgery, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, GBR.
Ellen Ellysia JonesTrauma and Orthopaedics, Ysbyty Gwynedd Hospital, Bangor, GBR.
Charlotte LemaigreTrauma and Orthopaedics, Ysbyty Gwynedd Hospital, Bangor, GBR.
Satya PydahTrauma and Orthopaedics, Ysbyty Gwynedd Hospital, Bangor, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Intraoperative safety protocols, including proper labelling of syringes, are critical to patient safety in surgical settings. While the Royal Pharmaceutical Society and the Royal College of Anaesthetists provide clear guidelines to prevent medication errors, ensuring consistent compliance with labelling protocols in the fast-paced and complex environment of orthopaedic surgery can still present practical challenges. The absence of proper labelling, combined with the use of multiple fluids such as normal saline, disinfectants, and local anaesthetics, increases the risk of adverse outcomes due to fluid misidentification. This quality improvement project aimed to assess current labelling practices in a district general hospital, identify barriers to compliance, and develop a cost-effective solution. Methodology The project was conducted in three orthopaedic theatres over two audit cycles. During the first audit cycle, 30 procedures were observed to assess compliance with labelling guidelines. Compliance was defined as the labelling of all syringes containing fluids present in the sterile field. Following this, an intervention was introduced, using surgical marker pens and sterile stickers for fluid labelling, along with a mandatory "tactical pause and check" and an awareness campaign. Two months later, a second audit of 34 procedures was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention. Results In the first audit cycle, only three out of 30 procedures (10%) were compliant with labelling guidelines. Following the intervention, compliance increased dramatically to 32 out of 34 procedures (94%). The results were statistically significant (p < 0.05) as determined by Fisher's exact test. The use of sterile stickers and marker pens proved to be a simple and cost-effective solution that did not interfere with the sterile environment or increase costs. Conclusions This study demonstrates that a low-cost intervention using sterile stickers and surgical marker pens can significantly improve compliance with fluid labelling guidelines in orthopaedic surgery, thereby enhancing patient safety. While the intervention was successful, future research should explore more sustainable solutions, such as pre-printed sterile labels, and evaluate the long-term impact of such interventions across various surgical settings. Continuous education and regular audits will be essential in maintaining high compliance rates.

Indexed as

fluid labellingintraoperative safetyorthopaedic surgeryquality improvementsterile environment

Identifiers

PMID39583373
PMCPMC11584542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.