Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39583372›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Rising Cesarean Section Rates in Pakistan: Analyzing Frequency and Key Risk Factors in a Tertiary-Care Hospital.

Ismail Jadoon, Mudassir Khattak, Khoula S Mughal, Umair S Mughal, Majid Khan, Saud A Abdulsamad, Abdulghani A Naeem

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ismail JadoonPharmacy, COMSATS University Islamabad, Abbottabad, PAK.
Mudassir KhattakPharmacy, Abasyn University, Peshawar, PAK.
Khoula S MughalPharmacy, COMSATS University Islamabad, Abbottabad, PAK.
Umair S MughalMedicine, Ayub Teaching Hospital, Abbottabad, PAK.
Majid KhanPharmacy, Abasyn University, Peshawar, PAK.
Saud A AbdulsamadBasic Sciences, College of Science and Health Professions, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah, SAU.
Abdulghani A NaeemBasic Sciences, College of Science and Health Professions, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah, SAU.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increasing frequency of cesarean sections (CS) has emerged as a significant public health concern, particularly in Pakistan. This cross-sectional study aimed to assess the prevalence of CS and its contributing factors among mothers in an underdeveloped region of the country. Data were collected from 250 delivery cases using a self-developed questionnaire. Among the participants, 110 (44%) had undergone CS, with 67 (60.9%) being emergency procedures and 43 (39.1%) elective. Statistical analysis revealed that younger maternal age (p = 0.04), type of CS (p = 0.05), and education level (p = 0.04) were significantly associated with higher rates of CS. Major medical risk factors contributing to CS included preeclampsia/eclampsia, vaginal hemorrhage, gestational diabetes, and hypertension (p < 0.001). Furthermore, urban residence, younger maternal age (20-24 years), and preterm gestational age were also identified as significant contributors. The findings suggest that the high rate of CS (44%) in the study population is influenced not only by physiological and medical factors but also by demographic elements such as education, income, and type of delivery. To mitigate unnecessary CS, community-focused educational interventions targeting at-risk populations should be implemented during pregnancy. Effective measures are essential to reduce the rising CS rates in Pakistan.

Indexed as

cesarean sectiondeterminantselectiveemergencyhaemorrhageperinatal mortalitypre-eclampsia

Identifiers

PMID39583372
PMCPMC11585390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.