Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39583356›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Socket Preservation Using Dense Polytetrafluoroethylene Membranes and Platelet-Rich Plasma.

Ralitsa V Yotsova

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ralitsa V YotsovaDepartment of Oral Surgery, Medical University of Varna, Varna, BGR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Socket preservation (SP) is a method aimed at reducing the post-extraction resorption of the alveolar crest and promoting bone deposition in the socket. It involves procedures such as atraumatic tooth extraction, guided regeneration with barrier membranes and bone substitutes, socket sealing, and immediate implant placement. This research aims to evaluate the influence of the combination of dense polytetrafluoroethylene (d-PTFE) membranes and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) on the vertical post-extraction resorption at the premolar and molar sites. Forty participants, aged 18-65 years, who needed extraction of a premolar or molar were enrolled and randomly assigned to an experimental group (SP with d-PTFE membrane and PRP) or a control group (spontaneous socket healing). The results demonstrated that SP with non-porous PTFE membranes and PRP reduced vertical bone resorption at the premolar and molar sites. Data analysis suggested that the buccal plate width influences the amount of its vertical resorption, but not as much as the management of the post-extraction socket (SP versus spontaneous socket healing). Further longitudinal randomized controlled trials are necessary to clarify which factors influence post-extraction ridge resorption and evaluate the success of different SP techniques.

Indexed as

dense polytetrafluoroethylene membraneplatelet-rich plasmapost-extraction ridge resorptionridge preservationsocket preservation

Identifiers

PMID39583356
PMCPMC11584985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.