ArticleSleep medicine: X2024
Sleep quality and associated factors in adults living in the southern Brazil: A population-based study.
Article in Sleep medicine: X, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To analyze sleep quality and associated socio-demographic and lifestyle factors in participants from a city originally colonised by Germans in southern Brazil. Methods: A cross-sectional population-based study of 2333 individuals aged 20 to 79 years. Data was collected by interview using a structured questionnaire. Sleep quality was assessed using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) questionnaire. The prevalence of poor sleep quality (PSQI score five or more) was estimated and the associations with study variables were measured by crude and adjusted prevalence ratios using Poisson regression. Results: participants were mostly women (50.9 %), with an average age of 43.3 years. The median total PSQI score was 4 (IQ = 3-7). The frequency of poor sleep quality was 32.7 % (95 % CI 30.7-34.4), higher in older adults (44.0 % vs 30.7 %; p<0.001) and women (40.0 % vs 25.2 %; p<0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that women (PR = 1.3; 95%CI 1.1- 1.5; p<0.001), former smokers (PR = 1.2; 95%CI 1.0-1.4; p = 0.014), current smokers (PR = 1.3; 95%CI 1.1-1.5; p = 0.006), depression (PR = 1.5; 95%CI 1.3-1.7; p<0.001), taking 5 or more medications (PR = 1.2; 95%CI 1.1-1.4; p = 0.001), self-perceived fair health (PR = 2.1; 95%CI 1.8-2.4; p<0.001) or poor/very poor health (PR = 2.6; 95%CI 2.1-3.1; p<0.001) were risk factors for poor sleep quality. Germanic culture (PR = 0.8; 95%CI 0.7-0.9; p<0.001), high school (PR = 0.8; 95%CI 0.6-1.0; p = 0.046) or elementary school (PR = 0.7; 95%CI 0.6-1.0; p = 0.025) or being at work (RP = 0.8; 95%CI 0.7-0.9; p = 0.002) were inversely associated with poor sleep quality. Conclusions: Women, older adults and some clinical, social, cultural and behavioural conditions are associated with poor sleep quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.