ArticleJPRAS open2024
Role of residual mandibular teeth after computer-assisted mandibular reconstruction using a fibular flap.
Article in JPRAS open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Computer-assisted mandibular reconstruction after mandibulectomy enables accurate reconstruction of the occlusal positions between the maxilla and mandible. Understanding the remaining teeth condition is essential for sensory mastication in patients with numerous tooth loss. However, no studies have examined the dental status of the remaining mandible after computer-assisted mandibular reconstruction using a fibular flap. This study evaluated the role of residual teeth and other factors in effective acquisition of oral intake after computer-assisted mandibular reconstruction using a fibular flap. Patients and Methods: Postoperative oral intake and associated factors were retrospectively examined in 57 consecutive patients. Oral intake was assessed using the Functional Oral Intake Scale. Multivariate analysis was performed to evaluate the remaining teeth arrangement (Eichner's classification), mandibular dentures, extent of resection (Brown's classification), age, performance of glossectomy, history of radiation therapy, and computer-assisted methods. Results: Multivariate analysis revealed that Eichner's classification had a positive (p<0.001) and radiation therapy had a negative (p<0.05) impact on oral intake. The patients with dentures anchored to the remaining teeth in the occlusal support area (i.e., premolar and molar) had higher Functional Oral Intake score than those with dentures anchored to the remaining teeth in the non-occlusal support area (6.78±0.03 vs. 6.10±0.07, p<0.005). Conclusion: In computer-assisted mandibular reconstruction with accurate occlusion, the residual teeth in the occlusal support area are essential for good postoperative oral intake with dentures. During mandibulectomy, if oncologically acceptable, these teeth should be preserved, and selective placement of dental implants in the occlusal support area should be considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.