ArticleAmerican journal of ophthalmology case reports2024
A lacrimal drainage pathway disease-associated keratopathy (LDAK) case with non-infectious endophthalmitis.
Article in American journal of ophthalmology case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To report a case of lacrimal drainage pathway disease-associated keratopathy (LDAK) with endophthalmitis. Observations: An 80-year-old man with diabetic retinopathy and nephropathy was referred to our hospital with endophthalmitis of the left eye. Slit-lamp examination revealed slight eye discharge, peripheral corneal ulcers, diffuse hyperemia of the conjunctiva, iris synechia, and a large amount of fibrin in the anterior chamber of the left eye. No puncta of the left eye were observed. The patient had undergone trabeculectomy for primary open-angle glaucoma 5 years previously. B-mode echo examination confirmed vitreous opacity in the left eye. We suspected endophthalmitis and performed a par-plana vitrectomy, bacterial culture, and polymerase chain reaction examination for eye discharge, aqueous humor, and vitreous humor. However, no bacteria or viruses were detected. The eye discharge and corneal peripheral ulcers did not improve following surgery. A lacrimal syringe test was performed two weeks after surgery, and bacterial concretion and discharge were observed. We detected Conclusions and importance: LDAK causes corneal perforation and endophthalmitis. In cases of intraocular inflammation with corneal ulcers, a lacrimal syringing test should be performed, even in the absence of lacrimal findings on slit-lamp examination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.