ArticleData in brief2024
Auditory evoked potential electroencephalography-biometric dataset.
Article in Data in brief, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- EEG Subject Identification and Open-Set Rejection Across Paradigms.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Auditory evoked potential electroencephalography-biometric dataset.Data in brief · 2024Article
- Capturing synchronization with complexity measure of ordinal pattern transition network constructed by crossplot.Royal Society open science · 2023Article
- The sound stimulation method and EEG change analysis for development of digital therapeutics that can stimulate the nervous system: Cortical activation and drug substitution potential.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This work aims to assess the use of electroencephalographic (EEG) signals as a means of biometric authentication. More than 240 recordings, each lasting 2 min, were gathered from 20 subjects involved in the data collection. Data include the results of experiments performed both in a resting state and in the presence of auditory stimuli. The resting-state EEG signals were acquired with both open and closed eyes. The auditory stimuli EEG signals consist of six experiments divided into two scenarios. The first scenario considers in-ear stimuli, while the second scenario considers bone-conducting stimuli. For each of the two scenarios, experiments include a native language song, a non-native language song and some neutral music. This data could be used to develop biometric systems for authentication or identification. Additionally, they could be used to study the effect of auditory stimuli such as music on EEG activity and to compare it with the resting state condition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.