ArticlePsychoradiology2024
Explorations of using a convolutional neural network to understand brain activations during movie watching.
Article in Psychoradiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Brain-AI Alignment in Naturalistic Movies.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Timing Is Everything: Temporal Dynamics of BOLD Responses to Naturalistic Features in Movie Watching.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Mapping the movie-watching brain with AI-derived semantics.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)Article
- Beyond the canonical HRF: Flexible temporal modeling reveals unconstrained BOLD profiles during naturalistic viewing.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Naturalistic stimuli, such as videos, can elicit complex brain activations. However, the intricate nature of these stimuli makes it challenging to attribute specific brain functions to the resulting activations, particularly for higher-level processes such as social interactions. Objective: We hypothesized that activations in different layers of a convolutional neural network (VGG-16) would correspond to varying levels of brain activation, reflecting the brain's visual processing hierarchy. Additionally, we aimed to explore which brain regions would be linked to the deeper layers of the network. Methods: This study analyzed functional MRI data from participants watching a cartoon video. Using a pre-trained VGG-16 convolutional neural network, we mapped hierarchical features of the video to different levels of brain activation. Activation maps from various kernels and layers were extracted from video frames, and the time series of average activation patterns for each kernel were used in a voxel-wise model to examine brain responses. Results: Lower layers of the network were primarily associated with activations in lower visual regions, although some kernels also unexpectedly showed associations with the posterior cingulate cortex. Deeper layers were linked to more anterior and lateral regions of the visual cortex, as well as the supramarginal gyrus. Conclusions: This analysis demonstrated both the potential and limitations of using convolutional neural networks to connect video content with brain functions, providing valuable insights into how different brain regions respond to varying levels of visual processing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.