ArticleFrontiers in cellular neuroscience2024
Does age protect against loss of tonotopy after acute deafness in adulthood?
Article in Frontiers in cellular neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neurophysiological sensitivity to envelope and pulse timing interaural time differences in cochlear implanted rats with different hearing experiences.The Journal of physiology · 2026Article
- Neuronal mechanisms underlying binaural performance with cochlear implant in single-sided deafness: a [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- Interactions of Interaural Time and Level Differences in Spatial Hearing with Cochlear Implants.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- When the First Pulse Fades: 75% Reduction in Precedence Effect in Cochlear Implanted Rats.Trends in hearingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The mammalian auditory system develops a topographical representation of sound frequencies along its pathways, also called tonotopy. In contrast, sensory deprivation during early development results in no or only rudimentary tonotopic organization. This study addresses two questions: (1) How robust is the central tonotopy when hearing fails in adulthood? (2) What role does age play at time of deafness? To address these questions, we deafened young and old adult rats with previously normal hearing. One month after deafening, both groups were unilaterally supplied with cochlear implants and electrically stimulated for 2 h. The central auditory neurons, which were activated as a result of the local electrical intracochlear stimulation, were visualized using Fos staining. While the auditory system of young rats lost the tonotopic organization throughout the brainstem, the auditory system of the older rats mainly sustained its tonotopy. It can be proposed that plasticity prevails in the central auditory system of young adult rats, while network stability prevails in the brains of aging rats. Consequently, age may be an important factor in protecting a hearing-experienced adult auditory system from a rapid loss of tonotopy when suffering from acute hearing loss. Furthermore, the study provides compelling evidence that acute deafness in young adult patients should be diagnosed as early as possible to prevent maladaptation of the central auditory system and thus achieve the optimal hearing outcome with a hearing prosthesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.