Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39583150›Full record

ReviewOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2024

Graft Failure in Pediatric Patients After Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone, Hamstring Tendon, or Quadriceps Tendon Autograft ACLR: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Camryn B Petit, Zaamin B Hussain, April McPherson, Erich J Petushek, Alicia M Montalvo, Mia S White, Harris S Slone, Joseph D Lamplot, John W Xerogeanes, Gregory D Myer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pediatric ACL Injuries: A Current Concepts Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Camryn B PetitEmory Sports Performance And Research Center (SPARC), Flowery Branch, Georgia, USA.
Zaamin B HussainDepartment of Orthopaedics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
April McPhersonEmory Sports Performance And Research Center (SPARC), Flowery Branch, Georgia, USA.
Erich J PetushekDepartment of Psychology and Human Factors, Michigan Technical University, Houghton, Michigan, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6837-5229
Alicia M MontalvoEmory Sports Performance And Research Center (SPARC), Flowery Branch, Georgia, USA.
Mia S WhiteEmory University Woodruff Health Sciences Center Library, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Harris S SloneDepartment of Orthopaedics and Physical Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
Joseph D LamplotEmory Sports Performance And Research Center (SPARC), Flowery Branch, Georgia, USA.
John W XerogeanesEmory Sports Performance And Research Center (SPARC), Flowery Branch, Georgia, USA.
Gregory D MyerEmory Sports Performance And Research Center (SPARC), Flowery Branch, Georgia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9983-8422

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reinjury risk is high in young athletes, with graft failure rates as high as 23%. The optimal autograft choice to minimize reinjury risk in this population is unclear. Purpose: To compare graft failure rates between bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB), hamstring tendon (HT), and quadriceps tendon (QT) autografts in patients aged ≤18 years with a minimum follow-up (FU) of 24 months. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A systematic review of the literature between database inception and March 2022 encompassed PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane CENTRAL, Embase, and Web of Science Core Collection databases. Studies on autograft ACL reconstruction (ACLR) using HT, QT, or BPTB autograft in patients ≤18 years old with a minimum FU of 2 years were included. Graft failure rates were pooled and estimated using random-effects models via the inverse variance method and logit transformations. Meta-analyses were used to estimate failure rates and pairwise comparisons were conducted by autograft type when appropriate. Results: A total of 24 studies comprising 2299 patients (HT: n = 1237, 44.8% female, 59.1-month mean FU; BPTB: n = 913, 67.3% female, 79.9-month mean FU; QT: n = 149, 36.4% female, 35.3-month mean FU) were included. HT exhibited the highest failure rate at 11.8% (95% CI, 9.0%-15.4%); failure rates for BPTB and QT were 7.9% (95% CI, 6.2%-10.0%) and 2.7% (95% CI, 1.0%-7.5%), respectively. HT had a significantly higher failure rate than both BPTB (Q = 5.01; Conclusion: While the HT remains a common choice for ACLR, the current aggregate data indicate that BPTB and QT demonstrated significantly lower failure rates than HT ACLR in adolescent athletes ≤18 years old. The QT demonstrated the lowest failure rate in adolescents but also the lowest proportion of patients represented due to a paucity of published QT data, indicating a need for future studies with larger sample sizes that include QT autografts, reduced risk of bias, and consistent reporting on skeletal maturity and surgical technique to better determine the ideal autograft for active athletic populations ≤18 years old.

Indexed as

ACLadolescentathletegraft failureknee

Identifiers

PMID39583150
PMCPMC11585031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.