Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39583096›Full record

ReviewJHEP reports : innovation in hepatology2024

Use of artificial intelligence for liver diseases: A survey from the EASL congress 2024.

Laura Žigutytė, Thomas Sorz-Nechay, Jan Clusmann, Jakob Nikolas Kather

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. [Research progress and future prospects for artificial intelligence in the diagnosis and treatment of fatty liver disease].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Laura ŽigutytėElse Kroener Fresenius Center for Digital Health, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany.
Thomas Sorz-NechayDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Jan ClusmannElse Kroener Fresenius Center for Digital Health, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany.
Jakob Nikolas KatherElse Kroener Fresenius Center for Digital Health, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) methods enable humans to analyse large amounts of data, which would otherwise not be feasibly quantifiable. This is especially true for unstructured visual and textual data, which can contain invaluable insights into disease. The hepatology research landscape is complex and has generated large amounts of data to be mined. Many open questions can potentially be addressed with existing data through AI methods. However, the field of AI is sometimes obscured by hype cycles and imprecise terminologies. This can conceal the fact that numerous hepatology research groups already use AI methods in their scientific studies. In this review article, we aim to assess the contemporaneous use of AI methods in hepatology in Europe. To achieve this, we systematically surveyed all scientific contributions presented at the EASL Congress 2024. Out of 1,857 accepted abstracts (1,712 posters and 145 oral presentations), 6 presentations (∼4%) and 69 posters (∼4%) utilised AI methods. Of these, 55 posters were included in this review, while the others were excluded due to missing posters or incomplete methodologies. Finally, we summarise current academic trends in the use of AI methods and outline future directions, providing guidance for scientific stakeholders in the field of hepatology.

Indexed as

biomarkersDeep learninglarge language modelsliver cancerliver cirrhosisliver fibrosismachine learningMASLDmedical datamedical image analysis

Identifiers

PMID39583096
PMCPMC11585758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.