ArticleFrontiers in public health2024
How supermarket retailers value business outcomes of healthy food retail strategies: a discrete choice experiment.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Supermarkets are businesses, and any voluntary changes to increase the healthiness of their food offerings must align with retailers' commercial needs. Business outcomes of healthy food retail strategies are important non-health factors that may influence retailers' decisions to implement these strategies. Although there is growing evidence on the significance of various business outcomes, such as net profit and customer satisfaction, it remains unclear how retailers value and trade-off these outcomes against each other. This study aimed to determine retailer preferences and measure their marginal willingness to pay for key business outcomes. Methods: A Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE) survey recruited current or former owners or managers of supermarkets or grocery stores in Australia. It included 12 choice tasks for two hypothetical scenarios (A or B) that the retailer could implement in their store, along with an option to maintain the current situation (opt-out option). The survey included six attributes (net profit, healthy items sold, customer and retailer satisfaction, ease and costs of implementation) with 3-4 levels each. A multinomial logit model was used to estimate preferences and calculate marginal rates of substitution and marginal willingness to pay. Results: Sixty-one respondents completed the DCE, resulting in a 72% response rate. Retailers identified customer satisfaction as the highest ranked business outcome when deciding to implement healthy food retail strategies. This was followed by the percentage of healthy items sold, supplier satisfaction, net profit, implementation cost, and ease of implementation. The marginal willingness to pay for different attribute levels varied from A$650 per year per store for a strategy that increases net profit by 3% to A$32,136 for a strategy leading to "very satisfied" levels of customer satisfaction compared to the base level. Conclusion: The results could be used to guide the implementation of healthy food retail strategies that also meet the needs of retailers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.