Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39583049›Full record

ArticleDermatology reports2024

The top 100 most cited articles in acne vulgaris: a bibliometric analysis.

Sapir Itzhaki Gabay, Barak Zlakishvili, Yuliya Valdman-Grinshpoun, Amir Horev

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dermatology reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sapir Itzhaki GabayDepartment of Dermatology, Soroka University Medical Center, Be'er-Sheva.
Barak ZlakishviliHebrew University School of Medicine, Jerusalem.
Yuliya Valdman-GrinshpounDepartment of Dermatology, Soroka University Medical Center, Be'er-Sheva.
Amir HorevFaculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Be'er-Sheva.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A substantial body of literature has been published on acne vulgaris (AV) in the past five decades. Bibliometric analysis (BA) is a scientific, statistical evaluation review of published articles, providing a quantitative assessment of past research. The Web of Science (webOS) citation indexing database was used on 11 June 2023 to identify the top 100 cited articles on AV. Articles were listed in descending order by their annual citation (AC). Data sets were then subdivided into senior author, year and age of publication, journal and its impact factor, the number of total citations according to the webOS, corresponding and senior author's affiliated institution, country of origin, manuscript type, study design, and research focus. The top 100 most cited articles were published between 1974 and 2020. The mean number of citations ranges between 82 and 688. The most cited paper was

Indexed as

acne vulgarisbibliometric analysiscitation

Identifiers

PMID39583049
PMCPMC11582959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.