Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39583040›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2024

Shifts in Chromosome Evolution Rates Shape the Karyotype Patterns of Leafcutting Ants.

Danon Clemes Cardoso, Maykon Passos Cristiano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Danon Clemes CardosoDepartamento de Biodiversidade, Evolução e Meio Ambiente Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto Ouro Preto Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2811-2536
Maykon Passos CristianoDepartamento de Biodiversidade, Evolução e Meio Ambiente Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto Ouro Preto Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7850-9155

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Trait evolution has become a central focus in evolutionary biology, with phylogenetic comparative methods offering a framework to study how and why traits vary among species. Identifying variations in trait evolution rates within phylogenies is important for uncovering the mechanisms behind these differences. Karyotype variation, which is substantial across eukaryotic organisms, plays an essential role in species diversification. This study investigates karyotype variation within the leafcutting ant clade, focusing on chromosome number and morphology. We aim to determine whether karyotypic traits are phylogenetically dependent and how different evolutionary models explain karyotype diversity. Previous models have been insufficient in explaining these variations. To address these gaps, we employ modern phylogenetic methods to assess the impact of chromosomal fissions and fusions on karyotype evolution. By evaluating various evolutionary models-particularly the Brownian motion model, which suggests neutral chromosomal changes-we pursue for the further understanding the mode and tempo of karyotype evolution in ants. Our research examines how shifts in chromosomal change rates contribute to divergence among leafcutting ant species and assesses the role of chromosomal changes in the clade's evolutionary trajectory. Comparative analysis of leafcutting ant ideograms suggests that shared karyotype traits are strongly related to species relationships. This implies that karyotype diversification in leafcutting ants follows a phylogenetic trajectory at varying rates, with differences in karyotype traits reflecting the evolutionary distance between lineages. Particularly, the increase in the chromosome number of

Indexed as

chromosome evolutionkaryotypeleafcutting antsphylogenetic comparative methodsphylogenetic inference

Identifiers

PMID39583040
PMCPMC11582084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.