ReviewExperimental and therapeutic medicine2025
Unveiling the depths of pelvic organ prolapse: From risk factors to therapeutic methods (Review).
Review in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- The effect of a self-care application on the quality of life of women with pelvic organ prolapse: a randomized controlled trial.BMC women's health · 2025Trial
- Tissue Biomarkers Outperform Plasma Signals in Pelvic Organ Prolapse: Evidence of a Dominant Extracellular Matrix Remodelling Phenotype.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Article
- Multimodal Prediction Model for Postoperative Voiding Dysfunction After Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery.International urogynecology journal · 2026Article
- Disentangling Procedural and Patient-Specific Drivers of Perioperative Outcomes in Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery: A Stratified Multigroup Analysis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Multidimensional regulation of estrogen signaling in pelvic floor connective tissue homeostasis and remodeling.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Medium- to Long-Term Follow-Up Study on Modified Manchester Procedure for Pelvic Organ Prolapse.International urogynecology journal · 2025Article
- Development and characterization of a novel immortalized human vaginal fibroblast cell line for advanced applications in reproductive health.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2025Article
- Extreme Uterine and Rectal Prolapse in a 31-Year-Old Patient: A Case Report.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a condition where one or more pelvic organs (such as the uterus, bladder and rectum) descend from their normal anatomical positions into the vagina, primarily due to the weakening of the pelvic floor support structures. While not life-threatening, POP can substantially diminish the patient's quality of life and lead to serious social and psychological complications. Researchers have explored novel directions regarding the etiology, mechanism and treatment of POP. However, existing literature on the subject often lacks comprehensive and systematic overviews. To address this gap and enhance researchers' understanding of POP, the present study reviewed the risk factors and molecular mechanisms of POP [including matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and tissue inhibitors of MMPs, transforming growth factor β, advanced glycation end products (AGEs)/receptor for AGE, phosphoinositide 3-kinase/protein kinase B, fibulin, lysyl oxidase-like 1, homeobox A11, collagen α-1 (XVIII) chain, Wnt signaling pathways and estrogen receptor α], as well as therapeutic approaches, such as lifestyle interventions, physical methods, pharmacotherapy, stem cell transplantation and surgical techniques. The present review aims to provide new insights for future research and contribute to the advancement of diagnosis and treatment strategies for POP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.