ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2024
Impact of water models on the structure and dynamics of enzyme tunnels.
Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Computational discovery of emodin-based anthraquinones as PARP-1 inhibitors with relevance to ovarian and prostate cancer.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Integrative Computational Chemistry Approaches in Modern Drug Discovery: Advances in Docking, Pharmacophore Modeling, Molecular Dynamics, and Virtual Screening.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Molecular Modeling of the Pathogenetic Mechanisms of Neuropsychiatric Disorders.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Screening of Novel Inhibitors Targeting the Non-ATP-binding Domain ofMedicinal chemistry (Shariqah (United Arab Emirates)) · 2026Article
- Article
- Targeting Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP-1) for DNA repair mechanism through QSAR-based virtual screening and MD simulation.Molecular diversity · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Protein hydration plays a vital role in many biological functions, and molecular dynamics simulations are frequently used to study it. However, the accuracy of these simulations is often sensitive to the water model used, a phenomenon particularly evident in intrinsically disordered proteins. Here, we investigated the extent to which the choice of water model alters the behavior of complex networks of tunnels within proteins. Tunnels are essential because they allow the exchange of substrates and products between buried enzyme active sites and the bulk solvent, directly affecting enzyme efficiency and selectivity, making the study of tunnels crucial for a holistic understanding of enzyme function at the molecular level. By performing simulations of haloalkane dehalogenase LinB and its two variants with engineered tunnels using TIP3P and OPC models, we investigated their effects on the overall tunnel topology. We also analyzed the properties of the primary tunnels, including their conformation, bottleneck dimensions, sampling efficiency, and the duration of tunnel openings. Our data demonstrate that all three proteins exhibited similar conformational behavior in both models but differed in the geometrical characteristics of their auxiliary tunnels, consistent with experimental observations. Interestingly, the results indicate that the stability of the open tunnels might be sensitive to the water model used. Because TIP3P can provide comparable data on the overall tunnel network, it is a valid choice when computational resources are limited or compatibility issues impede the use of OPC. However, OPC seems preferable for calculations requiring an accurate description of transport kinetics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.