Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39582837›Full record

ArticlePrecision clinical medicine2024

Comparative analysis of tertiary lymphoid structures for predicting survival of colorectal cancer: a whole-slide images-based study.

Ming He, Huifen Ye, Liu Liu, Su Yao, Zhenhui Li, Xinjuan Fan, Lili Feng, Tong Tong, Yanfen Cui, Xiaotang Yang and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Precision clinical medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Ming HeDepartment of Radiology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Huifen YeGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Artificial Intelligence in Medical Image Analysis and Application, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Liu LiuDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400042, China.
Su YaoDepartment of Pathology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Zhenhui LiGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Artificial Intelligence in Medical Image Analysis and Application, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Xinjuan FanDepartment of Pathology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052, China.
Lili FengDepartment of Radiology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China.
Tong TongDepartment of Radiology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China.
Yanfen CuiGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Artificial Intelligence in Medical Image Analysis and Application, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Xiaotang YangDepartment of Radiology, Shanxi Cancer Hospital, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan 030013, China.
Xiaomei WuDepartment of Radiology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510655, China.
Yun MaoDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400042, China.
Ke ZhaoDepartment of Radiology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Zaiyi LiuDepartment of Radiology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510080, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS) are major components in the immune microenvironment, correlating with a favorable prognosis in colorectal cancer. However, the methods used to define and characterize TLS were not united, hindering its clinical application. This study aims to seek a more stable method to characterize TLS and clarify their prognostic value in larger multicenter cohorts. Methods: A total of 1609 patients from four hospitals and The Cancer Genome Atlas database were analyzed. We quantified the number and maximum length of TLS along the invasive margin of tumor using hematoxylin and eosin-stained whole-slide images (WSIs). Additionally, the length of the invasive margin was determined to calculate the TLS density. The prognostic value of TLS for overall survival was evaluated. In addition, we examined the association between TLS density and immune cell infiltration using immunohistochemistry-stained WSIs. The performance for predicting overall survival was measured using hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: Among the three TLS quantification methods, TLS density has the strongest discriminative performance. Survival analysis indicated that higher TLS density correlated with better overall survival [HR for high vs. low 0.57 (95% CI 0.42-0.78) in the primary cohort; 0.49 (0.35-0.69) in the validation cohort; 0.35 (0.18-0.67) in TCGA cohort]. A high TLS density was associated with a high level of CD3 Conclusions: Based on this comparative multicenter analysis, TLS density was identified as a simple, robust, and effective immune prognostic index for colorectal cancer.

Indexed as

colorectal cancerdigital pathologyimmuneprognosistertiary lymphoid structures

Identifiers

PMID39582837
PMCPMC11582399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.