Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39582792›Full record

ArticleJournal of policy and practice in intellectual disabilities2024

What Would Have Helped People With Profound Intellectual and Multiple Disabilities in the UK During COVID-19?

Jill Bradshaw, Roseann Maguire, Amanda Gillooly, Christopher Hatton, Sue Caton, Andrew Jahoda, Edward Oloidi, Laurence Taggart, Stuart Todd, Richard Hastings

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of policy and practice in intellectual disabilities, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jill BradshawTizard Centre University of Kent Kent UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0379-8877
Roseann MaguireInstitute of Health and Wellbeing University of Glasgow Glasgow UK.
Amanda GilloolyInstitute of Health and Wellbeing University of Glasgow Glasgow UK.
Christopher HattonDepartment of Social Care and Social Work Manchester Metropolitan University Manchester UK.
Sue CatonDepartment of Social Care and Social Work Manchester Metropolitan University Manchester UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9013-8721
Andrew JahodaInstitute of Health and Wellbeing University of Glasgow Glasgow UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3985-6098
Edward OloidiUnit for Development in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities University of South Wales Cardiff UK.
Laurence TaggartInstitute of Nursing and Health Research University of Ulster Belfast UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0954-2127
Stuart ToddUnit for Development in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities University of South Wales Cardiff UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1640-2111
Richard HastingsCentre for Research in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities University of Warwick Coventry UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

People with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities can be excluded from research and relatively little is known about the experiences of people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities and their carers during COVID-19. This paper aims to further explore the impact on this group via information provided by paid and family carers. It focuses on key areas such as access to social and health services in addition to questions about health and well-being. In contextualising these results, some comparisons are made to impacts on other groups. This paper also explores what we might do better in future to support this population. Carers were invited to complete an online survey about their experiences and the experiences of people they supported during COVID-19 and to suggest what might have made life better. They were invited to complete this survey at four time points (waves) between December 2020 and December 2022. This paper reports on Waves 1-3, that is to August 2022. Services for people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities reduced during COVID-19 and have yet to return to pre-pandemic levels. People with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities were reported to experience increased social isolation, deteriorating mental and physical health, increased behavioural signs of distress and reduced life skills. Three areas were identified regarding what would have made life better: opportunities for social contact and activities; improved access to health and social care services, and; consistent and responsive staff. Results are explored in the context of current challenges in service provision, including staff retention and shifts in staff culture during the pandemic.

Indexed as

COVID‐19family carersmental healthphysical healthprofound intellectual and multiple disabilities

Identifiers

PMID39582792
PMCPMC11582349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.