Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39582788›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2024

Awareness, use, motivations and methods of accessing genetic testing in 2022 in the United States.

Sukh Makhnoon, MinJae Lee, Tanushree Prasad, Alexa Badalamenti, Tami Gurley, Erika A Waters, Celette Sugg Skinner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Neighborhood Opportunity and Genetic Literacy in a Representative Sample of US Adults.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sukh MakhnoonPeter O'Donnell Jr. School of Public Health, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States.
MinJae LeePeter O'Donnell Jr. School of Public Health, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States.
Tanushree PrasadPeter O'Donnell Jr. School of Public Health, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States.
Alexa BadalamentiHarold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States.
Tami GurleyPeter O'Donnell Jr. School of Public Health, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States.
Erika A WatersDepartment of Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, St Louis, MO, United States.
Celette Sugg SkinnerPeter O'Donnell Jr. School of Public Health, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States.

Funding

UT Southwestern Medical Center Simmons Comprehensive Cancer CenterP30CA142543 · NCI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI MELANIE H. COBB · 2010 to 2026
$53.7M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA142543
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Awareness, access, and use of clinical and direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic tests has increased in recent years with documented disparities in these services. We provide updated data on test awareness and use, and report novel data on motivations and methods for accessing genetic tests. Methods: Nationally representative data from the 2022 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS 6) were used to assess awareness and use of ancestry, personal trait, specific disease, and carrier testing by sociodemographic characteristics, examine reasons for undergoing tests, and methods of accessing them. Results: Overall, 81.4% of respondents were aware and 40.0% had undergone testing. Only 10% of tests were ordered by genetic counselors, 80% of carrier and 65% of specific disease tests were ordered by other healthcare providers. Understanding family history was the most common reason for undergoing ancestry (72.2%) or personal trait tests (64.9%) whereas reasons such as doctor's recommendation (53%-59%), learning more about disease risk (18%-50%), and carrier testing (76%) were common for undergoing disease risk tests and carrier tests. In contrast to ancestry, personal trait, and carrier testing, there were no racial, ethnic, income, or rural/urban difference in use of specific disease risk testing. Discussion: Diffusion of genetic tests into US society, although incremental, has made sizable increases in awareness, equitable use of specific disease tests but worsening socioeconomic inequality in DTC genetic test use. The study provides update on the state of genetic testing in the US and identifies groups that may need help accessing clinical genomic information and services.

Indexed as

awarenessdirect-to-consumerDTCgenetic testingprevalencetest useuse

Identifiers

PMID39582788
PMCPMC11582047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.