ArticleJournal of experimental orthopaedics2024
Machine learning in knee injury sequelae detection: Unravelling the role of psychological factors and preventing long-term sequelae.
Article in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Machine Learning Applications in Non-Contact Lower Limb Sports Injury Prediction: A Systematic Review.Journal of sports science & medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence and machine learning in sports medicine: mapping clinical tasks and assessing clinical maturity - a scoping review.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- No difference in sudden-onset injury risk between artificial turf and natural grass for Finnish female elite-level footballers: A five-season study.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2025Article
- Machine learning in knee injury sequelae detection: Unravelling the role of psychological factors and preventing long-term sequelae.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2024Article
- From injury to comeback: A systematic review of machine learning models predicting return to sport in athletes.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study evaluated the performance of three machine learning (ML) algorithms-decision tree (DT), multilayer perceptron (MLP) and extreme gradient boosting (XGB)-in identifying regular athletes who suffered a knee injury several months to years prior. In addition, the contribution of psychological variables in addition to biomechanical ones in the classification performance of the ML algorithms was assessed, to better identify factors to get back to competitive sport with the lowest possible risk of new knee injury. Methods: A cohort of 96 athletes, 36 with prior knee injuries, practicing an average of 5.7 ± 2.4 h per week, participated in a horizontal force-velocity test on a ballistic ergometer providing data of force, velocity and power from each lower limb. They also completed a psychological questionnaire, which included components from the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and the Sport Anxiety Scale (SAS). The three ML algorithms were trained on a thousand different train-test sets. Also, Shapley values were calculated for each input variable of a data set to highlight its contribution to the prediction from an ML model. Results: Over a thousand cross-validations, higher area under the curve (AUC) values were obtained when accounted for the psychological attributes ( Conclusions: Our results suggested that psychological factors play a more important role in recognition than biomechanical factors, with KOOS and SAS scores ranking high in the list of influential factors. Additionally, the computing stability of MLP could be recommended for classification tasks in the context of knee injuries. Level of Evidence: Level III.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.