Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39582766›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental orthopaedics2024

Machine learning in knee injury sequelae detection: Unravelling the role of psychological factors and preventing long-term sequelae.

Clément Lipps Lene, Julien Frere, Thierry Weissland

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Clément Lipps LeneUniversité de Bordeaux, Laboratoire IMS, UMR 5218, PMH_DySCo Pessac France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9528-4200
Julien FrereUniv. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, GIPSA-Lab Grenoble France.ORCID 0000-0002-4778-4514
Thierry WeisslandUniversité de Bordeaux, Laboratoire IMS, UMR 5218, PMH_DySCo Pessac France.ORCID 0000-0002-3281-504X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This study evaluated the performance of three machine learning (ML) algorithms-decision tree (DT), multilayer perceptron (MLP) and extreme gradient boosting (XGB)-in identifying regular athletes who suffered a knee injury several months to years prior. In addition, the contribution of psychological variables in addition to biomechanical ones in the classification performance of the ML algorithms was assessed, to better identify factors to get back to competitive sport with the lowest possible risk of new knee injury. Methods: A cohort of 96 athletes, 36 with prior knee injuries, practicing an average of 5.7 ± 2.4 h per week, participated in a horizontal force-velocity test on a ballistic ergometer providing data of force, velocity and power from each lower limb. They also completed a psychological questionnaire, which included components from the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and the Sport Anxiety Scale (SAS). The three ML algorithms were trained on a thousand different train-test sets. Also, Shapley values were calculated for each input variable of a data set to highlight its contribution to the prediction from an ML model. Results: Over a thousand cross-validations, higher area under the curve (AUC) values were obtained when accounted for the psychological attributes ( Conclusions: Our results suggested that psychological factors play a more important role in recognition than biomechanical factors, with KOOS and SAS scores ranking high in the list of influential factors. Additionally, the computing stability of MLP could be recommended for classification tasks in the context of knee injuries. Level of Evidence: Level III.

Indexed as

force‐velocityknee injurymachine learningrehabilitationsequelae detection

Identifiers

PMID39582766
PMCPMC11582922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.