Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39582760›Full record

ReviewACS environmental Au2024

Biogeochemistry of Actinides: Recent Progress and Perspective.

Gauthier J-P Deblonde

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS environmental Au, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Ultra-traceAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Gauthier J-P DeblondePhysical and Life Sciences Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94550, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0825-8714

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Actinides are elements that are often feared because of their radioactive nature and potentially devastating consequences to humans and the environment if not managed properly. As such, their chemical interactions with the biosphere and geochemical environment, i.e., their "biogeochemistry," must be studied and understood in detail. In this Review, a summary of the past discoveries and recent advances in the field of actinide biogeochemistry is provided with a particular emphasis on actinides other than thorium and uranium (i.e., actinium, neptunium, plutonium, americium, curium, berkelium, and californium) as they originate from anthropogenic activities and can be mobile in the environment. The nuclear properties of actinide isotopes found in the environment and used in research are reviewed with historical context. Then, the coordination chemistry properties of actinide ions are contrasted with those of common metal ions naturally present in the environment. The typical chelators that can impact the biogeochemistry of actinides are then reviewed. Then, the role of metalloproteins in the biogeochemistry of actinides is put into perspective since recent advances in the field may have ramifications in radiochemistry and for the long-term management of nuclear waste. Metalloproteins are ubiquitous ligands in nature but, as discussed in this Review, they have largely been overlooked for actinide chemistry, especially when compared to traditional environmental chelators. Without discounting the importance of abundant and natural actinide ions (i.e., Th

Identifiers

PMID39582760
PMCPMC11583103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.