ArticleCJC open2024
Sex Differences in Outcomes of Adults with Repaired Coarctation of Aorta and Concomitant Aortic Valve Disease.
Article in CJC open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Structural Heart Interventions in Women with Congenital Heart Disease.Current cardiology reports · 2026Review
- Cardiac Computed Tomography: Technological Developments and Clinical Applications.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Review
- Development of Cardiac Computed Tomography for Evaluation of Aortic Valve Stenosis.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Aortic valve disease is common in adults with coarctation of aorta. However, no systematic comparative analyses have been performed of the clinical course of aortic valve disease for male vs female patients in this population. The purpose of this study was to compare cardiac remodelling, onset of symptoms, and incidence of aortic valve replacement (AVR) for male vs female patients. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted of adults with repaired coarctation of aorta and ≥ moderate aortic stenosis and/or aortic regurgitation. Cardiac remodelling (left ventricular [LV], left atrial, right ventricular [RV], and right atrial structure and function) and symptomatic and/or functional class were determined at the baseline encounter. Development of new-onset symptoms and the incidence of AVR were ascertained for the period from baseline to last encounter. Results: We identified 214 patients (121 male [57%], 93 female [43%]). Although both groups had a similar aortic valve gradient, aortic valve area indexed to body surface area, aortic regurgitation severity, and functional status at baseline, female patients had more LV concentric hypertrophy and remodelling, left atrial hypertension and dysfunction, elevated RV systolic pressure, and RV systolic dysfunction. Of 151 patients without symptoms at baseline,102 (72%) developed symptoms. Female sex was independently associated with new-onset symptoms (adjusted hazard ratio 1.14, [95% confidence interval 1.05-1.23]). Of 214 patients, 191 (89%) underwent AVR. Female sex was not associated with AVR upon multivariable analysis. However, LV concentric hypertrophy and remodelling (both of which were more common in female patients) were associated with new-onset symptoms and AVR. Conclusions: Female patients, compared to male patients, had more-advanced cardiac remodelling, and more-rapid onset of symptoms, but a similar risk of AVR.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.