ArticleCJC open2024
Genetic Testing for Familial Hypercholesterolemia: The Current State of Its Implementation in Canada.
Article in CJC open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The functional landscape of coding variation in the familial hypercholesterolemia geneScience (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- Addressing genetic discrimination and its stigmatizing effects through human rights.Journal of community genetics · 2026Article
- Spectrum of DNA Variants in Southwestern Ontario Patients with Familial Hypercholesterolemia.CJC open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a common genetic disorder, yet it remains largely underdiagnosed in Canada. Multiple national and international guidelines recommend the use of clinical genetic testing for FH. However, the level of its accessibility and use within Canada is unclear. This study aims to describe the current state of clinical FH genetic testing in Canada and barriers to its implementation. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of 23 genetic counsellors across 8 provinces, through the Canadian Association of Genetic Counsellors Cardiac Communities of Practice, to obtain information about the accessibility of genetic testing for FH and the use of genetic-counselling services. Results: Responses were obtained from 12 genetic counsellors (52%). Of the 8 provinces surveyed, clinical FH genetic testing is available in 7, with British Columbia being the exception. The Simplified Canadian Definition for FH is the diagnostic criterion most commonly utilized to determine genetic-testing eligibility, and it is used in 5 of the 8 provinces. Notably, the referral rate to genetic counsellors typically is low, with most genetic-counselling programs receiving ≤ three referrals per site per month. Quebec is the only province to report a higher rate of genetic-counsellor referrals for FH. Conclusions: Clinical FH genetic testing is not available widely in Canada and its implementation varies significantly by province; this includes the eligibility criteria to qualify for testing as well as the utilization of genetic counsellors. A harmonized national approach to FH diagnosis could improve the rates of diagnosis and treatment.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.