Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39582638›Full record

ReviewFood chemistry: X2024

Nanotechnology in aquaculture: Transforming the future of food security.

Saba Khursheed Khan, Joydeep Dutta, Ishtiyaq Ahmad, Mohd Ashraf Rather

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Food chemistry: X, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Saba Khursheed KhanDepartment of Zoology, School of Bioengineering & Biosciences, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara, Punjab 144411, India.
Joydeep DuttaDepartment of Zoology, School of Bioengineering & Biosciences, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara, Punjab 144411, India.
Ishtiyaq AhmadDivision of Fish Genetics and Biotechnology, Faculty of Fisheries Ganderbal, Sher-e- Kashmir University of Agricultural Science and Technology, Kashmir 190006, India.
Mohd Ashraf RatherDivision of Fish Genetics and Biotechnology, Faculty of Fisheries Ganderbal, Sher-e- Kashmir University of Agricultural Science and Technology, Kashmir 190006, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the face of growing global challenges in food security and increasing demand for sustainable protein sources, the aquaculture industry is undergoing a transformative shift through the integration of nanotechnology. This review paper explores the profound role of nanotechnology in aquaculture, addressing critical issues such as efficient feed utilization, disease management, and environmental sustainability. Nanomaterials are used to enhance nutritional content and digestibility of aquafeed, optimize fish growth and health, and improve disease prevention. Nanoparticle-based vaccines and drug delivery systems reduce antibiotic reliance, while nano sensors monitor water quality in real-time. Furthermore, nanotechnology has revolutionized infrastructure design, contributing to smart, self-regulating aquaculture systems. Despite its vast potential, challenges such as ethical considerations and long-term safety must be addressed. This paper highlights nanotechnology's transformative role in aquaculture, underscoring its potential to contribute significantly to global food security through enhanced productivity and sustainability.

Indexed as

Aquafeed efficiencyDrug delivery systemsFish health managementNanomaterialsWater quality monitoring

Identifiers

PMID39582638
PMCPMC11585796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.