Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39582624›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2024

Effects of chitosan on plant growth under stress conditions: similarities with plant growth promoting bacteria.

Maura Rojas-Pirela, Petronia Carillo, Cristóbal Lárez-Velásquez, Gianfranco Romanazzi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Maura Rojas-PirelaLaboratorio de Enzimología de Parásitos, Departamento de Biología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Los Andes, Mérida, Venezuela.
Petronia CarilloDipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie Ambientali Biologiche e Farmaceutiche, Università degli Studi della Campania, Caserta, Italy.
Cristóbal Lárez-VelásquezGrupo de Polímeros, Departamento de Química, Universidad de Los Andes, Mérida, Venezuela.
Gianfranco RomanazziDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, Marche Polytechnic University, Ancona, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The agricultural use of synthetic pesticides, fertilizers, and growth regulators may represent a serious public health and environmental problem worldwide. All this has prompted the exploration of alternative chemical compounds, leading to exploring the potential of chitosan and PGPB in agricultural systems as a potential biotechnological solution to establish novel agricultural production practices that not only result in fewer adverse impacts on health and the environment but also improve the resilience and growth of the plants. In this work, an analysis of the impact of plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) and chitosan on plant growth and protection has been conducted, emphasizing the crucial bioactivities of the resistance of the plants to both biotic and abiotic stressors. These include inducing phytohormone production, mobilization of insoluble soil nutrients, biological nitrogen fixation, ethylene level regulation, controlling soil phytopathogens, etc. Moreover, some relevant aspects of chitin and chitosan are discussed, including their chemical structures, sources, and how their physical properties are related to beneficial effects on agricultural applications and mechanisms of action. The effects of PGPB and chitosan on photosynthesis, germination, root development, and protection against plant diseases have been compared, emphasizing the intriguing similarities and synergistic effects observed in some of these aspects. Although currently there are limited studies focused on the combined application of PGPB and chitosan, it would be important to consider the similarities highlighted in this work, and those that may emerge in future studies or through well-designed investigations, because these could permit advancing towards a greater knowledge of these systems and to obtain better formulations by combining these bioproducts, especially for use in the new contexts of sustainable agriculture. Thus, it seems feasible to augur a promising near future for these combinations, considering the wide range of possibilities offered by chitinous biomaterials for the development of innovative formulations, as well as allowing different application methods. Likewise, the studies related to the PGPB effects on plant growth appear to be expanding due to ongoing research to test on plants the impacts of microorganisms derived from different environments, whether known or recently discovered, making it a very exciting field of research.

Indexed as

biostimulantschitosaninduced resistanceplant growth-promoting bacteriastress 1

Identifiers

PMID39582624
PMCPMC11581901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.