ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024
Video- assisted thoracoscopic lung resection with or without enhanced recovery after surgery: a single institution, prospective randomized controlled study.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04451473 (The Short Term and Long Term Comparison of Lung Surgery With or Without Enhanced Recovery), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Short Term and Long Term Comparison of Lung Surgery With or Without Enhanced Recovery
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Comparative outcomes video-assisted thoracic surgery versus open thoracic surgery in pulmonary echinococcosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2025Pooled it
- The perioperative effect of ERAS protocol in patients with lung cancer: a randomized controlled study.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Trial
- [Expert Consensus on Shared Decision-making in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Ground-glass Opacity-featured Lung Adenocarcinoma].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2026Article
- Enhanced recovery after breast surgery: a review of international evidence and nursing challenges in China.American journal of translational research · 2026Review
- Application of Nursing Intervention Under the Guidance of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery in Patients Who Underwent Pulmonary Nodules Resection.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Article
- Identifying risk factors and pathogens in postoperative pneumonia after lung surgery for cancer: a retrospective cohort study.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- Minimally invasiveTranslational lung cancer research · 2025Article
- Predictive factors of patient length of stay with multiloculated pleural effusion after medical thoracoscopy: single-center retrospective cohort study.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study was conducted to evaluate the postoperative short-term outcomes of patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for lung resection with the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol. Methods: A single-institution, prospective randomized controlled study was conducted. The primary outcome measures were postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) and postoperative short-term effects. Results: Among the 611 patients, 305 were assigned to the ERAS group, and 306 were assigned to the routine group. The ERAS group achieved earlier oral feeding, earlier mobilization, a shorter duration of drainage (2.0 vs. 5.0 days, P<0.001), and a shorter hospital stay (3.0 vs. 7.0 days, P<0.001). The biological impacts were confirmed to be significantly better for the ERAS group. Furthermore, the ERAS group also had a lower incidence of PPCs (11.5% vs. 22.9%, P<0.001) than did the routine group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed the following predictors of drainage tube removal on the 1st day after surgery without pneumonia during hospitalization: comorbidity (P=0.029), surgical procedure (P=0.001), and operation time (P=0.039). Conclusions: Implementation of the ERAS protocol led to a decreased incidence of PPCs, suggesting that the ERAS protocol has a better biological impact on patients undergoing VATS for lung resection. Multigradient individual ERAS protocols are recommended at different institutions according to the individual conditions of patients. Clinical Trial Registration: https://register.clinicaltrials.gov/prs/app/action/SelectProtocol?sid=S0009ZT9&selectaction=Edit&uid=U0002ZGN&ts=3&cx=ks7hrg, identifier NCT04451473.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.