Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39582544›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024

Video- assisted thoracoscopic lung resection with or without enhanced recovery after surgery: a single institution, prospective randomized controlled study.

Yi Ding, Leiming Zhou, Lei Shan, Weiquan Zhang, Peichao Li, Bo Cong, Zhongxian Tian, Yunpeng Zhao, Xiaogang Zhao

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04451473 (The Short Term and Long Term Comparison of Lung Surgery With or Without Enhanced Recovery), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04451473 narecruitingnot on this map

The Short Term and Long Term Comparison of Lung Surgery With or Without Enhanced Recovery

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe Second Hospital of Shandong UniversityRan2019 to 2027Enrolled350ConditionsLung Cancer, Surgery, ERASArmsEnhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS ), Traditional perioperative management without Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS )
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Minimally invasiveTranslational lung cancer research · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yi DingDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The Second Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Leiming ZhouDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, People's Hospital of Laoling, Laoling of Dezhou, China.
Lei ShanDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The Second Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Weiquan ZhangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The Second Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Peichao LiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The Second Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Bo CongDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The Second Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Zhongxian TianDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The Second Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Yunpeng Zhao *Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Second Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Xiaogang Zhao *Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Second Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This study was conducted to evaluate the postoperative short-term outcomes of patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for lung resection with the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol. Methods: A single-institution, prospective randomized controlled study was conducted. The primary outcome measures were postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) and postoperative short-term effects. Results: Among the 611 patients, 305 were assigned to the ERAS group, and 306 were assigned to the routine group. The ERAS group achieved earlier oral feeding, earlier mobilization, a shorter duration of drainage (2.0 vs. 5.0 days, P<0.001), and a shorter hospital stay (3.0 vs. 7.0 days, P<0.001). The biological impacts were confirmed to be significantly better for the ERAS group. Furthermore, the ERAS group also had a lower incidence of PPCs (11.5% vs. 22.9%, P<0.001) than did the routine group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed the following predictors of drainage tube removal on the 1st day after surgery without pneumonia during hospitalization: comorbidity (P=0.029), surgical procedure (P=0.001), and operation time (P=0.039). Conclusions: Implementation of the ERAS protocol led to a decreased incidence of PPCs, suggesting that the ERAS protocol has a better biological impact on patients undergoing VATS for lung resection. Multigradient individual ERAS protocols are recommended at different institutions according to the individual conditions of patients. Clinical Trial Registration: https://register.clinicaltrials.gov/prs/app/action/SelectProtocol?sid=S0009ZT9&selectaction=Edit&uid=U0002ZGN&ts=3&cx=ks7hrg, identifier NCT04451473.

Indexed as

day surgeryenhanced recovery after surgerylung resectionpostoperative pulmonary complicationsthoracic surgery

Identifiers

PMID39582544
PMCPMC11582007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.