ArticleJournal of oral biology and craniofacial research
Comparative evaluation of efficacy of guided endodontic technique with and without sleeve for access cavity preparation: An In Vitro study.
Article in Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sleeve material, height, and drill surface changes in guided endodontics: Vicker's hardness and scanning electron microscope evaluation (A pilot study).BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Comparative evaluation between guided endodontics and conventional technique: A prospective clinical study.Bioinformation · 2026Article
- Primary Evaluation of Three-Dimensional Printing-Guided Endodontics in the Dog Maxillary.Veterinary sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Calcific metamorphosis in root canals is common and presents challenges in gaining access. Guided endodontics offers a solution to overcome these difficulties. The PriciGuide® system is a patented guided endodontic technique claiming superior precision compared to sleeve-based guides. This study aims to compare deviation between the PriciGuide® system and the guide with sleeve. Methods: A patient with calcified canal underwent CBCT scanning to obtain a DICOM file. Using the DICOM file, 3D models were printed. The patient's cast was scanned to obtain an STL file. Using DICOM and STL files, the guide with sleeve was designed using BlueSkyBio software and 3D printed. The PriciGuide® system was obtained from Roots to Cusps® Private Limited. Access opening was performed using conventional method, guide with sleeve and guide without sleeve (PriciGuide® system).Samples underwent radiograph scans to measure coronal, apical, and angular deviations, as well as procedural time. Results: One-Way ANOVA and Post Hoc Bonferroni's test revealed that coronal, apical, and angular deviations were lowest in the guide without sleeve group. However, access opening times were similar in both guided technique groups. Conclusions: The PriciGuide® system offers precise access cavity preparation for calcified canals, showing minimal deviation compared to the sleeve-based guides. It facilitates accurate root canal access regardless of the dentist's experience level. This study utilized 3D-printed teeth that do not fully replicate the complexities of natural teeth, further research is needed to validate the PriciGuide® system's performance on natural teeth and assess deviation using CBCT for a more comprehensive evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.